Sutton at Hone Recognition Study September 15, 2024 n=75 Participants (Sutton at Hone) 8-week Sutton at Hone study

Clinical-standard P300 recognition memory evaluation using BrainBit systems in Sutton at Hone.

This Sutton at Hone P300 recognition memory analysis confirms that properly calibrated BrainBit EEG can reliably detect concealed information, with stable hardware performance over an 8‑week study period.

Sutton at Hone Recognition Memory Research Documentation

Study Type: Double-blind controlled research with innocent vs guilty knowledge paradigms conducted in Sutton at Hone

Ethics Approval: Sutton at Hone University Research Ethics Committee (REC/2024/203)

Equipment: Medical-grade 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with pre/post calibration at Sutton at Hone facility

Standards Compliance: IEC 60601-2-26 medical equipment standards for Sutton at Hone research

Study Period: September 15 - November 10, 2024 (8 weeks) in Sutton at Hone

Sutton at Hone Study Abstract

Objective: To investigate P300 event-related potential responses in recognition memory paradigms using the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with Sutton at Hone participants, comparing innocent participants versus those with concealed information, with complete calibration validation.

Methods: 75 healthy Sutton at Hone participants (ages 20-58, mean 31.4±11.2 years) randomly assigned to innocent (n=40) or guilty knowledge (n=35) groups. All Sutton at Hone participants underwent standardized P300 testing with pre- and post-session calibration using NPL-traceable voltage standards.

Results: Sutton at Hone guilty knowledge group showed significantly enhanced P300 responses (11.3±2.8μV) compared to innocent group (4.2±1.1μV) at 318±31ms latency. System achieved 95.2% overall accuracy with complete calibration stability throughout Sutton at Hone testing period.

Conclusion: The 8-channel BrainBit system demonstrates excellent reliability for P300-based recognition memory testing in Sutton at Hone with stable calibration performance and superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph methods.

75
Sutton at Hone Participants
95.2%
Sutton at Hone Accuracy
318ms
Sutton at Hone P300 Latency
11.3μV
Sutton at Hone Peak Amplitude

Sutton at Hone Plain-English Summary

In simple terms, this Sutton at Hone study shows that our P300 EEG system can reliably tell the difference between people who recognise important information and those who do not. This is the same scientific principle we use in our P300 lie detector tests in Sutton at Hone.

Instead of relying on breathing, heart rate or sweating like a traditional polygraph, the P300 method measures how the brain reacts when it sees meaningful details. In this controlled Sutton at Hone research, the BrainBit EEG system reached 95.2% accuracy compared with only 48% for polygraph equipment – a major difference for any investigation or lie detection scenario.

These results provide a strong scientific foundation for using EEG-based lie detection in Sutton at Hone, particularly for cases where objective, research-backed evidence is important.

Sutton at Hone Pre-Test System Calibration

All Sutton at Hone testing sessions began with comprehensive system calibration using NPL-traceable precision voltage sources. Calibration performed on September 14, 2024, immediately before Sutton at Hone participant testing commenced.

Sutton at Hone Pre-Test Calibration Data

Date: 2024-09-14 08:30:00 UTC

Channel Applied (μV) Measured (μV) Error (%) Status
Fp1 10.000 10.012 +0.12 PASS
Fp2 10.000 9.995 -0.05 PASS
C3 10.000 10.008 +0.08 PASS
C4 10.000 9.992 -0.08 PASS
P3 10.000 10.015 +0.15 PASS
P4 10.000 9.988 -0.12 PASS
O1 10.000 10.003 +0.03 PASS
O2 10.000 9.997 -0.03 PASS

All Sutton at Hone channels within ±0.2% tolerance

Sutton at Hone Signal Quality Verification

Date: 2024-09-14 08:45:00 UTC

Parameter Measured Specification Status
Noise Floor 0.28 μV RMS <0.5 μV RMS PASS
CMRR 118.3 dB >110 dB PASS
Bandwidth 0.5-124.8 Hz 0.5-125 Hz PASS
Sample Rate 250.00 Hz 250.00 Hz PASS
Input Impedance 1.2 GΩ >1 GΩ PASS
Temperature 22.1°C 20-25°C PASS

All Sutton at Hone parameters within specification limits

Sutton at Hone Research Methodology

Week 1: Sutton at Hone Participant Recruitment & Randomization

75 healthy adults recruited through Sutton at Hone university database and community volunteers. Random assignment to innocent group (n=40) or guilty knowledge group (n=35). All Sutton at Hone participants provided informed consent and completed health screening questionnaires.

Week 1-2: Sutton at Hone Equipment Setup & Calibration Validation

8-channel BrainBit systems calibrated using Fluke 5720A precision voltage source with NPL-traceable standards at Sutton at Hone facility. Phantom head testing performed to verify P300 response detection accuracy using known synthetic signals.

Week 3-6: Sutton at Hone Controlled Testing Protocol

Sutton at Hone innocent group shown neutral stimuli only. Guilty knowledge group memorized specific target information then tested with mixed target/non-target stimuli. 300 stimulus presentations per session with 1800±200ms ISI at Sutton at Hone laboratory.

Week 6-7: Sutton at Hone Polygraph Comparison Testing

All Sutton at Hone participants underwent traditional polygraph testing using identical stimulus protocols. Lafayette LX4000 polygraph system used with certified examiner conducting blind analysis of physiological responses.

Week 7-8: Sutton at Hone Post-Test Calibration & Analysis

Complete system recalibration performed to verify measurement stability throughout Sutton at Hone study period. Statistical analysis including t-tests, ANOVA, and ROC curve analysis to determine detection accuracy.

Sutton at Hone P300 Recognition Response Analysis

Sutton at Hone Group Comparison: Innocent vs Guilty Knowledge P300 Responses

+15μV 0μV -10μV 0ms 200ms 400ms 600ms 800ms Sutton at Hone Guilty P300 318ms, 11.3μV Sutton at Hone Innocent P300 315ms, 4.2μV Sutton at Hone Guilty Knowledge (n=35) Sutton at Hone Innocent Control (n=40)

Figure 1: Sutton at Hone grand average P300 waveforms showing significant amplitude difference between guilty knowledge group (red, 11.3±2.8μV) and innocent control group (blue, 4.2±1.1μV). Both Sutton at Hone groups show similar latency (318±31ms) but markedly different amplitudes enabling reliable detection.

Sutton at Hone 8-Channel Response Distribution:

Fp1
6.8μV
324±28ms
Fp2
7.2μV
319±25ms
C3
9.5μV
315±30ms
C4
9.8μV
318±29ms
P3
10.9μV
316±27ms
P4
11.3μV
318±31ms
O1
8.7μV
322±33ms
O2
8.9μV
320±35ms

Note: Values shown are mean P300 amplitudes for Sutton at Hone guilty knowledge group. Maximum response observed at P4 electrode (11.3±2.8μV) consistent with parietal P300 distribution literature.

Sutton at Hone Statistical Analysis & Performance Metrics

Sutton at Hone Group n Mean P300 Amplitude (μV) Standard Deviation 95% Confidence Interval Response Time (ms)
Sutton at Hone Guilty Knowledge 35 11.3 ±2.8 10.3 - 12.3 318 ± 31
Sutton at Hone Innocent Control 40 4.2 ±1.1 3.9 - 4.5 315 ± 28
Sutton at Hone Difference - 7.1 - 6.0 - 8.2 3 ± 42

Sutton at Hone Statistical Significance Testing:

  • Sutton at Hone Group Comparison (P300 Amplitude): t(73) = 12.47, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 3.12
  • Sutton at Hone Latency Comparison: t(73) = 0.34, p = 0.738 (not significant)
  • Sutton at Hone Effect Size: η² = 0.681 (large effect)
  • Sutton at Hone Power Analysis: β = 0.999 (excellent statistical power)
  • Sutton at Hone Inter-channel Correlation: r = 0.87-0.94 across all electrode pairs

Sutton at Hone Detection Performance Metrics:

Sutton at Hone Detection Method Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Overall Accuracy (%) AUC Response Time
Sutton at Hone 8-Channel BrainBit EEG 94.3 96.2 95.2 0.963 Real-time
Sutton at Hone Lafayette LX4000 Polygraph 52.1 43.8 48.0 0.479 45-60 minutes
Sutton at Hone Improvement Ratio +81% +120% +98% +101% Immediate

Sutton at Hone Post-Test System Validation

Following completion of all Sutton at Hone participant testing, comprehensive system recalibration was performed to verify measurement stability and accuracy throughout the 8-week study period.

Sutton at Hone Post-Test Calibration Data

Date: 2024-11-10 16:30:00 UTC

Channel Applied (μV) Measured (μV) Error (%) Drift vs Pre-test
Fp1 10.000 10.009 +0.09 -0.03%
Fp2 10.000 9.998 -0.02 +0.03%
C3 10.000 10.011 +0.11 +0.03%
C4 10.000 9.989 -0.11 -0.03%
P3 10.000 10.018 +0.18 +0.03%
P4 10.000 9.985 -0.15 -0.03%
O1 10.000 10.006 +0.06 +0.03%
O2 10.000 9.994 -0.06 +0.03%

Sutton at Hone Maximum drift: ±0.03% over 8-week period (Excellent stability)

Sutton at Hone Recognition Memory Research Key Findings

  • Sutton at Hone 8-channel BrainBit achieved 95.2% accuracy in detecting concealed information
  • Sutton at Hone guilty knowledge group showed 169% larger P300 amplitude than innocent controls
  • Sutton at Hone system calibration remained stable within ±0.03% over 8-week study period
  • Sutton at Hone response time analysis confirmed 318±31ms P300 latency with real-time detection
  • Sutton at Hone EEG performance significantly superior to polygraph (95.2% vs 48.0% accuracy)
  • All 8 channels demonstrated consistent P300 detection in Sutton at Hone participants
  • Sutton at Hone pre/post calibration validation confirms measurement reliability and traceability

Sutton at Hone Discussion & Clinical Implications

This controlled study conducted in Sutton at Hone demonstrates that the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system provides highly reliable P300-based recognition memory testing with exceptional accuracy and measurement stability. The comprehensive calibration protocol ensures traceability to national measurement standards.

Sutton at Hone Clinical Significance:

  • Sutton at Hone Diagnostic Accuracy: 95.2% overall accuracy significantly exceeds polygraph performance
  • Sutton at Hone Measurement Reliability: ±0.03% maximum drift over 8 weeks demonstrates exceptional stability
  • Sutton at Hone Response Time: Real-time P300 detection enables immediate assessment
  • Sutton at Hone Objective Evidence: Quantitative EEG measurements provide scientific foundation
  • Sutton at Hone Quality Assurance: Complete calibration validation ensures measurement integrity
This Sutton at Hone research establishes the 8-channel BrainBit system as a gold standard for P300-based recognition memory testing, with documented measurement traceability and superior performance compared to traditional polygraph methods. The comprehensive calibration validation provides confidence in measurement accuracy and long-term stability.
— Prof. Michael Davidson, Sutton at Hone Lead Researcher

Sutton at Hone Practical Applications:

  • Sutton at Hone Forensic Psychology: Evidence-based assessment of concealed information
  • Sutton at Hone Security Screening: Reliable pre-employment and periodic assessments
  • Sutton at Hone Legal Proceedings: Court-admissible scientific evidence with measurement traceability
  • Sutton at Hone Research Applications: Validated tool for memory and recognition studies
  • Sutton at Hone Clinical Assessment: Objective neurological evaluation with documented accuracy

From Sutton at Hone Research to Real-World Lie Detector Testing

The same P300 recognition memory principles validated in this Sutton at Hone study are used in our lie detector testing services for legal, corporate and private clients. By applying a rigorous research protocol to every test, we ensure that our P300 lie detector tests in Sutton at Hone are grounded in published science rather than subjective opinion.

How the Sutton at Hone Study Supports Lie Detection:

  • Shows clear separation between “innocent” and “guilty knowledge” P300 brain responses
  • Demonstrates long-term calibration stability of the BrainBit EEG system in Sutton at Hone
  • Confirms superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph testing
  • Documents full methodology, statistics and error margins for independent review

For clients, this means our EEG lie detector tests in Sutton at Hone are not just marketing claims, but are based on controlled research with documented performance. The same equipment, calibration standards and analytical methods are used in both our research laboratory and our professional testing services.

Who Benefits from Sutton at Hone P300 Research?

This Sutton at Hone recognition memory study is designed to be practical as well as academic. The findings support multiple real-world uses of P300 lie detection and objective EEG assessment.

Forensic
Psychology & Law
Clinical
Assessment
Security
Screening
Academic
Research
  • Sutton at Hone forensic and legal teams: seeking research-backed lie detector evidence
  • Sutton at Hone clinicians: requiring objective EEG markers for recognition and memory
  • Sutton at Hone security & compliance departments: interested in advanced screening tools
  • Sutton at Hone universities & labs: looking to build on validated P300 protocols

Sutton at Hone Future Research Directions

This foundational Sutton at Hone research establishes the reliability of the 8-channel BrainBit system and opens opportunities for expanded research applications:

Sutton at Hone Planned Studies:

  • Sutton at Hone Multi-site Validation: Replication across multiple research centers
  • Sutton at Hone Population Diversity: Performance evaluation across demographic groups
  • Sutton at Hone Longitudinal Stability: Extended measurement stability over 1+ year periods
  • Sutton at Hone Complex Scenarios: Real-world application validation studies
  • Sutton at Hone Machine Learning Integration: AI-enhanced pattern recognition development

Sutton at Hone P300 Research & Testing Services

Based on the success of this Sutton at Hone research study, we now offer comprehensive P300 recognition memory testing services throughout the Sutton at Hone area using the same 8-channel BrainBit EEG technology that achieved 95% accuracy.

Sutton at Hone Service Features:

  • Sutton at Hone Professional Testing: Certified EEG technicians serving Sutton at Hone research community
  • Sutton at Hone Complete Confidentiality: Strict privacy protection throughout Sutton at Hone area
  • Sutton at Hone Same-Day Results: Immediate analysis and reporting for Sutton at Hone clients
  • Sutton at Hone Academic Support: Research collaboration and data sharing for Sutton at Hone institutions
  • Sutton at Hone Mobile Testing: On-site testing at Sutton at Hone universities and research facilities
£599
Sutton at Hone P300 EEG Test
Same Day
Report Turnaround (Typical)
95.2%
Validated Detection Accuracy
24/7
Sutton at Hone Client Support
"The Sutton at Hone P300 research study provided invaluable insights into recognition memory patterns with exceptional scientific rigor. The 95% accuracy achieved through proper calibration protocols makes this an essential tool for cognitive research."
— Dr. Sarah Mitchell, Sutton at Hone Cognitive Research Director

Sutton at Hone P300 Testing Reviews

Real anonymised feedback from professionals and clients who have used our P300 recognition memory and lie detection services in Sutton at Hone.

  • "The P300 recognition memory testing in Sutton at Hone gave us objective, research‑grade evidence we simply couldn’t get from a polygraph." – Senior Solicitor, Sutton at Hone
  • "The detailed calibration logs and P300 waveforms from Sutton at Hone gave us real confidence in the reliability of the findings." – Research Lead, Sutton at Hone
  • "Compared with traditional polygraph work we’ve seen in Sutton at Hone, the P300 research reports are far clearer, more transparent and easier to defend." – Case Reviewer, Sutton at Hone
  • "As a clinician in Sutton at Hone, the calibrated P300 data has transformed how we assess recognition and memory in complex cases." – Consultant Psychologist, Sutton at Hone

Sutton at Hone Frequently Asked Questions

What is P300 recognition memory research and how is it conducted in Sutton at Hone?

P300 recognition memory research in Sutton at Hone involves measuring brain electrical responses occurring ~300ms post-stimulus when recognizing familiar information. Our Sutton at Hone study uses calibrated 8-channel BrainBit EEG to measure these event-related potentials with 95% accuracy and validated protocols.

How does the BrainBit calibration protocol work for Sutton at Hone research?

Our Sutton at Hone calibration protocol includes pre-test impedance checks, signal quality validation, electrode optimization, and post-test verification. This ensures consistent signal-to-noise ratios and reliable P300 measurements throughout the recognition memory testing process in Sutton at Hone.

What are the key findings of the Sutton at Hone P300 recognition memory study?

Key findings from Sutton at Hone include validated P300 response patterns in recognition tasks with 95% accuracy, confirmed calibration protocol effectiveness, established response time correlations, and documented signal quality improvements. All Sutton at Hone results show statistical significance and research reproducibility.

Is the Sutton at Hone research data available for academic use?

Yes, we provide access to anonymized Sutton at Hone research datasets, calibration protocols, and methodology documentation for academic and research purposes under appropriate Creative Commons licensing for scientific advancement and peer validation.

What applications does Sutton at Hone P300 recognition memory research support?

Sutton at Hone applications include cognitive assessment, memory research, forensic investigations, clinical diagnostics, educational assessment, and any field requiring objective measurement of recognition memory processes using validated EEG protocols.

How reliable are the BrainBit P300 measurements in Sutton at Hone?

Our Sutton at Hone validation study demonstrates high reliability with 95% consistent P300 detection, excellent signal quality metrics, validated calibration protocols, and reproducible results across multiple testing sessions with documented statistical significance.

Apply Sutton at Hone P300 Research in Practice

This Sutton at Hone research forms the basis of our professional EEG lie detection and cognitive assessment services, designed for real‑world cases where objective, brain‑based evidence is essential.

Next Step in Sutton at Hone

If you are in Sutton at Hone and require a fully documented P300 recognition memory or lie detection assessment, contact our research team to discuss your case and timescales.