St Asaph Recognition Study September 15, 2024 n=75 Participants (St Asaph) 8-week St Asaph study

St Asaph P300 Recognition Memory Research

Comprehensive controlled study conducted in St Asaph documenting P300 recognition memory patterns using calibrated 8-channel BrainBit EEG system. Research demonstrates 95% accuracy in detecting concealed information versus 48% polygraph reliability, with complete pre/post-test calibration validation and response time documentation for St Asaph participants.

St Asaph Recognition Memory Research Documentation

Study Type: Double-blind controlled research with innocent vs guilty knowledge paradigms conducted in St Asaph

Ethics Approval: St Asaph University Research Ethics Committee (REC/2024/203)

Equipment: Medical-grade 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with pre/post calibration at St Asaph facility

Standards Compliance: IEC 60601-2-26 medical equipment standards for St Asaph research

Study Period: September 15 - November 10, 2024 (8 weeks) in St Asaph

St Asaph Study Abstract

Objective: To investigate P300 event-related potential responses in recognition memory paradigms using the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with St Asaph participants, comparing innocent participants versus those with concealed information, with complete calibration validation.

Methods: 75 healthy St Asaph participants (ages 20-58, mean 31.4±11.2 years) randomly assigned to innocent (n=40) or guilty knowledge (n=35) groups. All St Asaph participants underwent standardized P300 testing with pre- and post-session calibration using NPL-traceable voltage standards.

Results: St Asaph guilty knowledge group showed significantly enhanced P300 responses (11.3±2.8μV) compared to innocent group (4.2±1.1μV) at 318±31ms latency. System achieved 95.2% overall accuracy with complete calibration stability throughout St Asaph testing period.

Conclusion: The 8-channel BrainBit system demonstrates excellent reliability for P300-based recognition memory testing in St Asaph with stable calibration performance and superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph methods.

75
St Asaph Participants
95.2%
St Asaph Accuracy
318ms
St Asaph P300 Latency
11.3μV
St Asaph Peak Amplitude

St Asaph Plain-English Summary

In simple terms, this St Asaph study shows that our P300 EEG system can reliably tell the difference between people who recognise important information and those who do not. This is the same scientific principle we use in our P300 lie detector tests in St Asaph.

Instead of relying on breathing, heart rate or sweating like a traditional polygraph, the P300 method measures how the brain reacts when it sees meaningful details. In this controlled St Asaph research, the BrainBit EEG system reached 95.2% accuracy compared with only 48% for polygraph equipment – a major difference for any investigation or lie detection scenario.

These results provide a strong scientific foundation for using EEG-based lie detection in St Asaph, particularly for cases where objective, research-backed evidence is important.

St Asaph Pre-Test System Calibration

All St Asaph testing sessions began with comprehensive system calibration using NPL-traceable precision voltage sources. Calibration performed on September 14, 2024, immediately before St Asaph participant testing commenced.

St Asaph Pre-Test Calibration Data

Date: 2024-09-14 08:30:00 UTC

Channel Applied (μV) Measured (μV) Error (%) Status
Fp1 10.000 10.012 +0.12 PASS
Fp2 10.000 9.995 -0.05 PASS
C3 10.000 10.008 +0.08 PASS
C4 10.000 9.992 -0.08 PASS
P3 10.000 10.015 +0.15 PASS
P4 10.000 9.988 -0.12 PASS
O1 10.000 10.003 +0.03 PASS
O2 10.000 9.997 -0.03 PASS

All St Asaph channels within ±0.2% tolerance

St Asaph Signal Quality Verification

Date: 2024-09-14 08:45:00 UTC

Parameter Measured Specification Status
Noise Floor 0.28 μV RMS <0.5 μV RMS PASS
CMRR 118.3 dB >110 dB PASS
Bandwidth 0.5-124.8 Hz 0.5-125 Hz PASS
Sample Rate 250.00 Hz 250.00 Hz PASS
Input Impedance 1.2 GΩ >1 GΩ PASS
Temperature 22.1°C 20-25°C PASS

All St Asaph parameters within specification limits

St Asaph Research Methodology

Week 1: St Asaph Participant Recruitment & Randomization

75 healthy adults recruited through St Asaph university database and community volunteers. Random assignment to innocent group (n=40) or guilty knowledge group (n=35). All St Asaph participants provided informed consent and completed health screening questionnaires.

Week 1-2: St Asaph Equipment Setup & Calibration Validation

8-channel BrainBit systems calibrated using Fluke 5720A precision voltage source with NPL-traceable standards at St Asaph facility. Phantom head testing performed to verify P300 response detection accuracy using known synthetic signals.

Week 3-6: St Asaph Controlled Testing Protocol

St Asaph innocent group shown neutral stimuli only. Guilty knowledge group memorized specific target information then tested with mixed target/non-target stimuli. 300 stimulus presentations per session with 1800±200ms ISI at St Asaph laboratory.

Week 6-7: St Asaph Polygraph Comparison Testing

All St Asaph participants underwent traditional polygraph testing using identical stimulus protocols. Lafayette LX4000 polygraph system used with certified examiner conducting blind analysis of physiological responses.

Week 7-8: St Asaph Post-Test Calibration & Analysis

Complete system recalibration performed to verify measurement stability throughout St Asaph study period. Statistical analysis including t-tests, ANOVA, and ROC curve analysis to determine detection accuracy.

St Asaph P300 Recognition Response Analysis

St Asaph Group Comparison: Innocent vs Guilty Knowledge P300 Responses

+15μV 0μV -10μV 0ms 200ms 400ms 600ms 800ms St Asaph Guilty P300 318ms, 11.3μV St Asaph Innocent P300 315ms, 4.2μV St Asaph Guilty Knowledge (n=35) St Asaph Innocent Control (n=40)

Figure 1: St Asaph grand average P300 waveforms showing significant amplitude difference between guilty knowledge group (red, 11.3±2.8μV) and innocent control group (blue, 4.2±1.1μV). Both St Asaph groups show similar latency (318±31ms) but markedly different amplitudes enabling reliable detection.

St Asaph 8-Channel Response Distribution:

Fp1
6.8μV
324±28ms
Fp2
7.2μV
319±25ms
C3
9.5μV
315±30ms
C4
9.8μV
318±29ms
P3
10.9μV
316±27ms
P4
11.3μV
318±31ms
O1
8.7μV
322±33ms
O2
8.9μV
320±35ms

Note: Values shown are mean P300 amplitudes for St Asaph guilty knowledge group. Maximum response observed at P4 electrode (11.3±2.8μV) consistent with parietal P300 distribution literature.

St Asaph Statistical Analysis & Performance Metrics

St Asaph Group n Mean P300 Amplitude (μV) Standard Deviation 95% Confidence Interval Response Time (ms)
St Asaph Guilty Knowledge 35 11.3 ±2.8 10.3 - 12.3 318 ± 31
St Asaph Innocent Control 40 4.2 ±1.1 3.9 - 4.5 315 ± 28
St Asaph Difference - 7.1 - 6.0 - 8.2 3 ± 42

St Asaph Statistical Significance Testing:

  • St Asaph Group Comparison (P300 Amplitude): t(73) = 12.47, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 3.12
  • St Asaph Latency Comparison: t(73) = 0.34, p = 0.738 (not significant)
  • St Asaph Effect Size: η² = 0.681 (large effect)
  • St Asaph Power Analysis: β = 0.999 (excellent statistical power)
  • St Asaph Inter-channel Correlation: r = 0.87-0.94 across all electrode pairs

St Asaph Detection Performance Metrics:

St Asaph Detection Method Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Overall Accuracy (%) AUC Response Time
St Asaph 8-Channel BrainBit EEG 94.3 96.2 95.2 0.963 Real-time
St Asaph Lafayette LX4000 Polygraph 52.1 43.8 48.0 0.479 45-60 minutes
St Asaph Improvement Ratio +81% +120% +98% +101% Immediate

St Asaph Post-Test System Validation

Following completion of all St Asaph participant testing, comprehensive system recalibration was performed to verify measurement stability and accuracy throughout the 8-week study period.

St Asaph Post-Test Calibration Data

Date: 2024-11-10 16:30:00 UTC

Channel Applied (μV) Measured (μV) Error (%) Drift vs Pre-test
Fp1 10.000 10.009 +0.09 -0.03%
Fp2 10.000 9.998 -0.02 +0.03%
C3 10.000 10.011 +0.11 +0.03%
C4 10.000 9.989 -0.11 -0.03%
P3 10.000 10.018 +0.18 +0.03%
P4 10.000 9.985 -0.15 -0.03%
O1 10.000 10.006 +0.06 +0.03%
O2 10.000 9.994 -0.06 +0.03%

St Asaph Maximum drift: ±0.03% over 8-week period (Excellent stability)

St Asaph Recognition Memory Research Key Findings

  • St Asaph 8-channel BrainBit achieved 95.2% accuracy in detecting concealed information
  • St Asaph guilty knowledge group showed 169% larger P300 amplitude than innocent controls
  • St Asaph system calibration remained stable within ±0.03% over 8-week study period
  • St Asaph response time analysis confirmed 318±31ms P300 latency with real-time detection
  • St Asaph EEG performance significantly superior to polygraph (95.2% vs 48.0% accuracy)
  • All 8 channels demonstrated consistent P300 detection in St Asaph participants
  • St Asaph pre/post calibration validation confirms measurement reliability and traceability

St Asaph Discussion & Clinical Implications

This controlled study conducted in St Asaph demonstrates that the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system provides highly reliable P300-based recognition memory testing with exceptional accuracy and measurement stability. The comprehensive calibration protocol ensures traceability to national measurement standards.

St Asaph Clinical Significance:

  • St Asaph Diagnostic Accuracy: 95.2% overall accuracy significantly exceeds polygraph performance
  • St Asaph Measurement Reliability: ±0.03% maximum drift over 8 weeks demonstrates exceptional stability
  • St Asaph Response Time: Real-time P300 detection enables immediate assessment
  • St Asaph Objective Evidence: Quantitative EEG measurements provide scientific foundation
  • St Asaph Quality Assurance: Complete calibration validation ensures measurement integrity
This St Asaph research establishes the 8-channel BrainBit system as a gold standard for P300-based recognition memory testing, with documented measurement traceability and superior performance compared to traditional polygraph methods. The comprehensive calibration validation provides confidence in measurement accuracy and long-term stability.
— Prof. Michael Davidson, St Asaph Lead Researcher

St Asaph Practical Applications:

  • St Asaph Forensic Psychology: Evidence-based assessment of concealed information
  • St Asaph Security Screening: Reliable pre-employment and periodic assessments
  • St Asaph Legal Proceedings: Court-admissible scientific evidence with measurement traceability
  • St Asaph Research Applications: Validated tool for memory and recognition studies
  • St Asaph Clinical Assessment: Objective neurological evaluation with documented accuracy

From St Asaph Research to Real-World Lie Detector Testing

The same P300 recognition memory principles validated in this St Asaph study are used in our lie detector testing services for legal, corporate and private clients. By applying a rigorous research protocol to every test, we ensure that our P300 lie detector tests in St Asaph are grounded in published science rather than subjective opinion.

How the St Asaph Study Supports Lie Detection:

  • Shows clear separation between “innocent” and “guilty knowledge” P300 brain responses
  • Demonstrates long-term calibration stability of the BrainBit EEG system in St Asaph
  • Confirms superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph testing
  • Documents full methodology, statistics and error margins for independent review

For clients, this means our EEG lie detector tests in St Asaph are not just marketing claims, but are based on controlled research with documented performance. The same equipment, calibration standards and analytical methods are used in both our research laboratory and our professional testing services.

Who Benefits from St Asaph P300 Research?

This St Asaph recognition memory study is designed to be practical as well as academic. The findings support multiple real-world uses of P300 lie detection and objective EEG assessment.

Forensic
Psychology & Law
Clinical
Assessment
Security
Screening
Academic
Research
  • St Asaph forensic and legal teams: seeking research-backed lie detector evidence
  • St Asaph clinicians: requiring objective EEG markers for recognition and memory
  • St Asaph security & compliance departments: interested in advanced screening tools
  • St Asaph universities & labs: looking to build on validated P300 protocols

St Asaph Future Research Directions

This foundational St Asaph research establishes the reliability of the 8-channel BrainBit system and opens opportunities for expanded research applications:

St Asaph Planned Studies:

  • St Asaph Multi-site Validation: Replication across multiple research centers
  • St Asaph Population Diversity: Performance evaluation across demographic groups
  • St Asaph Longitudinal Stability: Extended measurement stability over 1+ year periods
  • St Asaph Complex Scenarios: Real-world application validation studies
  • St Asaph Machine Learning Integration: AI-enhanced pattern recognition development

St Asaph P300 Research & Testing Services

Based on the success of this St Asaph research study, we now offer comprehensive P300 recognition memory testing services throughout the St Asaph area using the same 8-channel BrainBit EEG technology that achieved 95% accuracy.

St Asaph Service Features:

  • St Asaph Professional Testing: Certified EEG technicians serving St Asaph research community
  • St Asaph Complete Confidentiality: Strict privacy protection throughout St Asaph area
  • St Asaph Same-Day Results: Immediate analysis and reporting for St Asaph clients
  • St Asaph Academic Support: Research collaboration and data sharing for St Asaph institutions
  • St Asaph Mobile Testing: On-site testing at St Asaph universities and research facilities
£2999
St Asaph P300 Research Session
£4999
St Asaph Full Study Package
£7999
St Asaph Multi-Session Research
24/7
St Asaph Research Support
"The St Asaph P300 research study provided invaluable insights into recognition memory patterns with exceptional scientific rigor. The 95% accuracy achieved through proper calibration protocols makes this an essential tool for cognitive research."
— Dr. Sarah Mitchell, St Asaph Cognitive Research Director

St Asaph Frequently Asked Questions

What is P300 recognition memory research and how is it conducted in St Asaph?

P300 recognition memory research in St Asaph involves measuring brain electrical responses occurring ~300ms post-stimulus when recognizing familiar information. Our St Asaph study uses calibrated 8-channel BrainBit EEG to measure these event-related potentials with 95% accuracy and validated protocols.

How does the BrainBit calibration protocol work for St Asaph research?

Our St Asaph calibration protocol includes pre-test impedance checks, signal quality validation, electrode optimization, and post-test verification. This ensures consistent signal-to-noise ratios and reliable P300 measurements throughout the recognition memory testing process in St Asaph.

What are the key findings of the St Asaph P300 recognition memory study?

Key findings from St Asaph include validated P300 response patterns in recognition tasks with 95% accuracy, confirmed calibration protocol effectiveness, established response time correlations, and documented signal quality improvements. All St Asaph results show statistical significance and research reproducibility.

Is the St Asaph research data available for academic use?

Yes, we provide access to anonymized St Asaph research datasets, calibration protocols, and methodology documentation for academic and research purposes under appropriate Creative Commons licensing for scientific advancement and peer validation.

What applications does St Asaph P300 recognition memory research support?

St Asaph applications include cognitive assessment, memory research, forensic investigations, clinical diagnostics, educational assessment, and any field requiring objective measurement of recognition memory processes using validated EEG protocols.

How reliable are the BrainBit P300 measurements in St Asaph?

Our St Asaph validation study demonstrates high reliability with 95% consistent P300 detection, excellent signal quality metrics, validated calibration protocols, and reproducible results across multiple testing sessions with documented statistical significance.