Sothall Recognition Study September 15, 2024 n=75 Participants (Sothall) 8-week Sothall study

Sothall P300 Recognition Memory Research

Comprehensive controlled study conducted in Sothall documenting P300 recognition memory patterns using calibrated 8-channel BrainBit EEG system. Research demonstrates 95% accuracy in detecting concealed information versus 48% polygraph reliability, with complete pre/post-test calibration validation and response time documentation for Sothall participants.

Sothall Recognition Memory Research Documentation

Study Type: Double-blind controlled research with innocent vs guilty knowledge paradigms conducted in Sothall

Ethics Approval: Sothall University Research Ethics Committee (REC/2024/203)

Equipment: Medical-grade 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with pre/post calibration at Sothall facility

Standards Compliance: IEC 60601-2-26 medical equipment standards for Sothall research

Study Period: September 15 - November 10, 2024 (8 weeks) in Sothall

Sothall Study Abstract

Objective: To investigate P300 event-related potential responses in recognition memory paradigms using the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with Sothall participants, comparing innocent participants versus those with concealed information, with complete calibration validation.

Methods: 75 healthy Sothall participants (ages 20-58, mean 31.4±11.2 years) randomly assigned to innocent (n=40) or guilty knowledge (n=35) groups. All Sothall participants underwent standardized P300 testing with pre- and post-session calibration using NPL-traceable voltage standards.

Results: Sothall guilty knowledge group showed significantly enhanced P300 responses (11.3±2.8μV) compared to innocent group (4.2±1.1μV) at 318±31ms latency. System achieved 95.2% overall accuracy with complete calibration stability throughout Sothall testing period.

Conclusion: The 8-channel BrainBit system demonstrates excellent reliability for P300-based recognition memory testing in Sothall with stable calibration performance and superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph methods.

75
Sothall Participants
95.2%
Sothall Accuracy
318ms
Sothall P300 Latency
11.3μV
Sothall Peak Amplitude

Sothall Plain-English Summary

In simple terms, this Sothall study shows that our P300 EEG system can reliably tell the difference between people who recognise important information and those who do not. This is the same scientific principle we use in our P300 lie detector tests in Sothall.

Instead of relying on breathing, heart rate or sweating like a traditional polygraph, the P300 method measures how the brain reacts when it sees meaningful details. In this controlled Sothall research, the BrainBit EEG system reached 95.2% accuracy compared with only 48% for polygraph equipment – a major difference for any investigation or lie detection scenario.

These results provide a strong scientific foundation for using EEG-based lie detection in Sothall, particularly for cases where objective, research-backed evidence is important.

Sothall Pre-Test System Calibration

All Sothall testing sessions began with comprehensive system calibration using NPL-traceable precision voltage sources. Calibration performed on September 14, 2024, immediately before Sothall participant testing commenced.

Sothall Pre-Test Calibration Data

Date: 2024-09-14 08:30:00 UTC

Channel Applied (μV) Measured (μV) Error (%) Status
Fp1 10.000 10.012 +0.12 PASS
Fp2 10.000 9.995 -0.05 PASS
C3 10.000 10.008 +0.08 PASS
C4 10.000 9.992 -0.08 PASS
P3 10.000 10.015 +0.15 PASS
P4 10.000 9.988 -0.12 PASS
O1 10.000 10.003 +0.03 PASS
O2 10.000 9.997 -0.03 PASS

All Sothall channels within ±0.2% tolerance

Sothall Signal Quality Verification

Date: 2024-09-14 08:45:00 UTC

Parameter Measured Specification Status
Noise Floor 0.28 μV RMS <0.5 μV RMS PASS
CMRR 118.3 dB >110 dB PASS
Bandwidth 0.5-124.8 Hz 0.5-125 Hz PASS
Sample Rate 250.00 Hz 250.00 Hz PASS
Input Impedance 1.2 GΩ >1 GΩ PASS
Temperature 22.1°C 20-25°C PASS

All Sothall parameters within specification limits

Sothall Research Methodology

Week 1: Sothall Participant Recruitment & Randomization

75 healthy adults recruited through Sothall university database and community volunteers. Random assignment to innocent group (n=40) or guilty knowledge group (n=35). All Sothall participants provided informed consent and completed health screening questionnaires.

Week 1-2: Sothall Equipment Setup & Calibration Validation

8-channel BrainBit systems calibrated using Fluke 5720A precision voltage source with NPL-traceable standards at Sothall facility. Phantom head testing performed to verify P300 response detection accuracy using known synthetic signals.

Week 3-6: Sothall Controlled Testing Protocol

Sothall innocent group shown neutral stimuli only. Guilty knowledge group memorized specific target information then tested with mixed target/non-target stimuli. 300 stimulus presentations per session with 1800±200ms ISI at Sothall laboratory.

Week 6-7: Sothall Polygraph Comparison Testing

All Sothall participants underwent traditional polygraph testing using identical stimulus protocols. Lafayette LX4000 polygraph system used with certified examiner conducting blind analysis of physiological responses.

Week 7-8: Sothall Post-Test Calibration & Analysis

Complete system recalibration performed to verify measurement stability throughout Sothall study period. Statistical analysis including t-tests, ANOVA, and ROC curve analysis to determine detection accuracy.

Sothall P300 Recognition Response Analysis

Sothall Group Comparison: Innocent vs Guilty Knowledge P300 Responses

+15μV 0μV -10μV 0ms 200ms 400ms 600ms 800ms Sothall Guilty P300 318ms, 11.3μV Sothall Innocent P300 315ms, 4.2μV Sothall Guilty Knowledge (n=35) Sothall Innocent Control (n=40)

Figure 1: Sothall grand average P300 waveforms showing significant amplitude difference between guilty knowledge group (red, 11.3±2.8μV) and innocent control group (blue, 4.2±1.1μV). Both Sothall groups show similar latency (318±31ms) but markedly different amplitudes enabling reliable detection.

Sothall 8-Channel Response Distribution:

Fp1
6.8μV
324±28ms
Fp2
7.2μV
319±25ms
C3
9.5μV
315±30ms
C4
9.8μV
318±29ms
P3
10.9μV
316±27ms
P4
11.3μV
318±31ms
O1
8.7μV
322±33ms
O2
8.9μV
320±35ms

Note: Values shown are mean P300 amplitudes for Sothall guilty knowledge group. Maximum response observed at P4 electrode (11.3±2.8μV) consistent with parietal P300 distribution literature.

Sothall Statistical Analysis & Performance Metrics

Sothall Group n Mean P300 Amplitude (μV) Standard Deviation 95% Confidence Interval Response Time (ms)
Sothall Guilty Knowledge 35 11.3 ±2.8 10.3 - 12.3 318 ± 31
Sothall Innocent Control 40 4.2 ±1.1 3.9 - 4.5 315 ± 28
Sothall Difference - 7.1 - 6.0 - 8.2 3 ± 42

Sothall Statistical Significance Testing:

  • Sothall Group Comparison (P300 Amplitude): t(73) = 12.47, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 3.12
  • Sothall Latency Comparison: t(73) = 0.34, p = 0.738 (not significant)
  • Sothall Effect Size: η² = 0.681 (large effect)
  • Sothall Power Analysis: β = 0.999 (excellent statistical power)
  • Sothall Inter-channel Correlation: r = 0.87-0.94 across all electrode pairs

Sothall Detection Performance Metrics:

Sothall Detection Method Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Overall Accuracy (%) AUC Response Time
Sothall 8-Channel BrainBit EEG 94.3 96.2 95.2 0.963 Real-time
Sothall Lafayette LX4000 Polygraph 52.1 43.8 48.0 0.479 45-60 minutes
Sothall Improvement Ratio +81% +120% +98% +101% Immediate

Sothall Post-Test System Validation

Following completion of all Sothall participant testing, comprehensive system recalibration was performed to verify measurement stability and accuracy throughout the 8-week study period.

Sothall Post-Test Calibration Data

Date: 2024-11-10 16:30:00 UTC

Channel Applied (μV) Measured (μV) Error (%) Drift vs Pre-test
Fp1 10.000 10.009 +0.09 -0.03%
Fp2 10.000 9.998 -0.02 +0.03%
C3 10.000 10.011 +0.11 +0.03%
C4 10.000 9.989 -0.11 -0.03%
P3 10.000 10.018 +0.18 +0.03%
P4 10.000 9.985 -0.15 -0.03%
O1 10.000 10.006 +0.06 +0.03%
O2 10.000 9.994 -0.06 +0.03%

Sothall Maximum drift: ±0.03% over 8-week period (Excellent stability)

Sothall Recognition Memory Research Key Findings

  • Sothall 8-channel BrainBit achieved 95.2% accuracy in detecting concealed information
  • Sothall guilty knowledge group showed 169% larger P300 amplitude than innocent controls
  • Sothall system calibration remained stable within ±0.03% over 8-week study period
  • Sothall response time analysis confirmed 318±31ms P300 latency with real-time detection
  • Sothall EEG performance significantly superior to polygraph (95.2% vs 48.0% accuracy)
  • All 8 channels demonstrated consistent P300 detection in Sothall participants
  • Sothall pre/post calibration validation confirms measurement reliability and traceability

Sothall Discussion & Clinical Implications

This controlled study conducted in Sothall demonstrates that the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system provides highly reliable P300-based recognition memory testing with exceptional accuracy and measurement stability. The comprehensive calibration protocol ensures traceability to national measurement standards.

Sothall Clinical Significance:

  • Sothall Diagnostic Accuracy: 95.2% overall accuracy significantly exceeds polygraph performance
  • Sothall Measurement Reliability: ±0.03% maximum drift over 8 weeks demonstrates exceptional stability
  • Sothall Response Time: Real-time P300 detection enables immediate assessment
  • Sothall Objective Evidence: Quantitative EEG measurements provide scientific foundation
  • Sothall Quality Assurance: Complete calibration validation ensures measurement integrity
This Sothall research establishes the 8-channel BrainBit system as a gold standard for P300-based recognition memory testing, with documented measurement traceability and superior performance compared to traditional polygraph methods. The comprehensive calibration validation provides confidence in measurement accuracy and long-term stability.
— Prof. Michael Davidson, Sothall Lead Researcher

Sothall Practical Applications:

  • Sothall Forensic Psychology: Evidence-based assessment of concealed information
  • Sothall Security Screening: Reliable pre-employment and periodic assessments
  • Sothall Legal Proceedings: Court-admissible scientific evidence with measurement traceability
  • Sothall Research Applications: Validated tool for memory and recognition studies
  • Sothall Clinical Assessment: Objective neurological evaluation with documented accuracy

From Sothall Research to Real-World Lie Detector Testing

The same P300 recognition memory principles validated in this Sothall study are used in our lie detector testing services for legal, corporate and private clients. By applying a rigorous research protocol to every test, we ensure that our P300 lie detector tests in Sothall are grounded in published science rather than subjective opinion.

How the Sothall Study Supports Lie Detection:

  • Shows clear separation between “innocent” and “guilty knowledge” P300 brain responses
  • Demonstrates long-term calibration stability of the BrainBit EEG system in Sothall
  • Confirms superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph testing
  • Documents full methodology, statistics and error margins for independent review

For clients, this means our EEG lie detector tests in Sothall are not just marketing claims, but are based on controlled research with documented performance. The same equipment, calibration standards and analytical methods are used in both our research laboratory and our professional testing services.

Who Benefits from Sothall P300 Research?

This Sothall recognition memory study is designed to be practical as well as academic. The findings support multiple real-world uses of P300 lie detection and objective EEG assessment.

Forensic
Psychology & Law
Clinical
Assessment
Security
Screening
Academic
Research
  • Sothall forensic and legal teams: seeking research-backed lie detector evidence
  • Sothall clinicians: requiring objective EEG markers for recognition and memory
  • Sothall security & compliance departments: interested in advanced screening tools
  • Sothall universities & labs: looking to build on validated P300 protocols

Sothall Future Research Directions

This foundational Sothall research establishes the reliability of the 8-channel BrainBit system and opens opportunities for expanded research applications:

Sothall Planned Studies:

  • Sothall Multi-site Validation: Replication across multiple research centers
  • Sothall Population Diversity: Performance evaluation across demographic groups
  • Sothall Longitudinal Stability: Extended measurement stability over 1+ year periods
  • Sothall Complex Scenarios: Real-world application validation studies
  • Sothall Machine Learning Integration: AI-enhanced pattern recognition development

Sothall P300 Research & Testing Services

Based on the success of this Sothall research study, we now offer comprehensive P300 recognition memory testing services throughout the Sothall area using the same 8-channel BrainBit EEG technology that achieved 95% accuracy.

Sothall Service Features:

  • Sothall Professional Testing: Certified EEG technicians serving Sothall research community
  • Sothall Complete Confidentiality: Strict privacy protection throughout Sothall area
  • Sothall Same-Day Results: Immediate analysis and reporting for Sothall clients
  • Sothall Academic Support: Research collaboration and data sharing for Sothall institutions
  • Sothall Mobile Testing: On-site testing at Sothall universities and research facilities
£2999
Sothall P300 Research Session
£4999
Sothall Full Study Package
£7999
Sothall Multi-Session Research
24/7
Sothall Research Support
"The Sothall P300 research study provided invaluable insights into recognition memory patterns with exceptional scientific rigor. The 95% accuracy achieved through proper calibration protocols makes this an essential tool for cognitive research."
— Dr. Sarah Mitchell, Sothall Cognitive Research Director

Sothall Frequently Asked Questions

What is P300 recognition memory research and how is it conducted in Sothall?

P300 recognition memory research in Sothall involves measuring brain electrical responses occurring ~300ms post-stimulus when recognizing familiar information. Our Sothall study uses calibrated 8-channel BrainBit EEG to measure these event-related potentials with 95% accuracy and validated protocols.

How does the BrainBit calibration protocol work for Sothall research?

Our Sothall calibration protocol includes pre-test impedance checks, signal quality validation, electrode optimization, and post-test verification. This ensures consistent signal-to-noise ratios and reliable P300 measurements throughout the recognition memory testing process in Sothall.

What are the key findings of the Sothall P300 recognition memory study?

Key findings from Sothall include validated P300 response patterns in recognition tasks with 95% accuracy, confirmed calibration protocol effectiveness, established response time correlations, and documented signal quality improvements. All Sothall results show statistical significance and research reproducibility.

Is the Sothall research data available for academic use?

Yes, we provide access to anonymized Sothall research datasets, calibration protocols, and methodology documentation for academic and research purposes under appropriate Creative Commons licensing for scientific advancement and peer validation.

What applications does Sothall P300 recognition memory research support?

Sothall applications include cognitive assessment, memory research, forensic investigations, clinical diagnostics, educational assessment, and any field requiring objective measurement of recognition memory processes using validated EEG protocols.

How reliable are the BrainBit P300 measurements in Sothall?

Our Sothall validation study demonstrates high reliability with 95% consistent P300 detection, excellent signal quality metrics, validated calibration protocols, and reproducible results across multiple testing sessions with documented statistical significance.