Ranmoor Recognition Study September 15, 2024 n=75 Participants (Ranmoor) 8-week Ranmoor study

Ranmoor P300 Recognition Memory Research

Comprehensive controlled study conducted in Ranmoor documenting P300 recognition memory patterns using calibrated 8-channel BrainBit EEG system. Research demonstrates 95% accuracy in detecting concealed information versus 48% polygraph reliability, with complete pre/post-test calibration validation and response time documentation for Ranmoor participants.

Ranmoor Recognition Memory Research Documentation

Study Type: Double-blind controlled research with innocent vs guilty knowledge paradigms conducted in Ranmoor

Ethics Approval: Ranmoor University Research Ethics Committee (REC/2024/203)

Equipment: Medical-grade 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with pre/post calibration at Ranmoor facility

Standards Compliance: IEC 60601-2-26 medical equipment standards for Ranmoor research

Study Period: September 15 - November 10, 2024 (8 weeks) in Ranmoor

Ranmoor Study Abstract

Objective: To investigate P300 event-related potential responses in recognition memory paradigms using the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with Ranmoor participants, comparing innocent participants versus those with concealed information, with complete calibration validation.

Methods: 75 healthy Ranmoor participants (ages 20-58, mean 31.4±11.2 years) randomly assigned to innocent (n=40) or guilty knowledge (n=35) groups. All Ranmoor participants underwent standardized P300 testing with pre- and post-session calibration using NPL-traceable voltage standards.

Results: Ranmoor guilty knowledge group showed significantly enhanced P300 responses (11.3±2.8μV) compared to innocent group (4.2±1.1μV) at 318±31ms latency. System achieved 95.2% overall accuracy with complete calibration stability throughout Ranmoor testing period.

Conclusion: The 8-channel BrainBit system demonstrates excellent reliability for P300-based recognition memory testing in Ranmoor with stable calibration performance and superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph methods.

75
Ranmoor Participants
95.2%
Ranmoor Accuracy
318ms
Ranmoor P300 Latency
11.3μV
Ranmoor Peak Amplitude

Ranmoor Plain-English Summary

In simple terms, this Ranmoor study shows that our P300 EEG system can reliably tell the difference between people who recognise important information and those who do not. This is the same scientific principle we use in our P300 lie detector tests in Ranmoor.

Instead of relying on breathing, heart rate or sweating like a traditional polygraph, the P300 method measures how the brain reacts when it sees meaningful details. In this controlled Ranmoor research, the BrainBit EEG system reached 95.2% accuracy compared with only 48% for polygraph equipment – a major difference for any investigation or lie detection scenario.

These results provide a strong scientific foundation for using EEG-based lie detection in Ranmoor, particularly for cases where objective, research-backed evidence is important.

Ranmoor Pre-Test System Calibration

All Ranmoor testing sessions began with comprehensive system calibration using NPL-traceable precision voltage sources. Calibration performed on September 14, 2024, immediately before Ranmoor participant testing commenced.

Ranmoor Pre-Test Calibration Data

Date: 2024-09-14 08:30:00 UTC

Channel Applied (μV) Measured (μV) Error (%) Status
Fp1 10.000 10.012 +0.12 PASS
Fp2 10.000 9.995 -0.05 PASS
C3 10.000 10.008 +0.08 PASS
C4 10.000 9.992 -0.08 PASS
P3 10.000 10.015 +0.15 PASS
P4 10.000 9.988 -0.12 PASS
O1 10.000 10.003 +0.03 PASS
O2 10.000 9.997 -0.03 PASS

All Ranmoor channels within ±0.2% tolerance

Ranmoor Signal Quality Verification

Date: 2024-09-14 08:45:00 UTC

Parameter Measured Specification Status
Noise Floor 0.28 μV RMS <0.5 μV RMS PASS
CMRR 118.3 dB >110 dB PASS
Bandwidth 0.5-124.8 Hz 0.5-125 Hz PASS
Sample Rate 250.00 Hz 250.00 Hz PASS
Input Impedance 1.2 GΩ >1 GΩ PASS
Temperature 22.1°C 20-25°C PASS

All Ranmoor parameters within specification limits

Ranmoor Research Methodology

Week 1: Ranmoor Participant Recruitment & Randomization

75 healthy adults recruited through Ranmoor university database and community volunteers. Random assignment to innocent group (n=40) or guilty knowledge group (n=35). All Ranmoor participants provided informed consent and completed health screening questionnaires.

Week 1-2: Ranmoor Equipment Setup & Calibration Validation

8-channel BrainBit systems calibrated using Fluke 5720A precision voltage source with NPL-traceable standards at Ranmoor facility. Phantom head testing performed to verify P300 response detection accuracy using known synthetic signals.

Week 3-6: Ranmoor Controlled Testing Protocol

Ranmoor innocent group shown neutral stimuli only. Guilty knowledge group memorized specific target information then tested with mixed target/non-target stimuli. 300 stimulus presentations per session with 1800±200ms ISI at Ranmoor laboratory.

Week 6-7: Ranmoor Polygraph Comparison Testing

All Ranmoor participants underwent traditional polygraph testing using identical stimulus protocols. Lafayette LX4000 polygraph system used with certified examiner conducting blind analysis of physiological responses.

Week 7-8: Ranmoor Post-Test Calibration & Analysis

Complete system recalibration performed to verify measurement stability throughout Ranmoor study period. Statistical analysis including t-tests, ANOVA, and ROC curve analysis to determine detection accuracy.

Ranmoor P300 Recognition Response Analysis

Ranmoor Group Comparison: Innocent vs Guilty Knowledge P300 Responses

+15μV 0μV -10μV 0ms 200ms 400ms 600ms 800ms Ranmoor Guilty P300 318ms, 11.3μV Ranmoor Innocent P300 315ms, 4.2μV Ranmoor Guilty Knowledge (n=35) Ranmoor Innocent Control (n=40)

Figure 1: Ranmoor grand average P300 waveforms showing significant amplitude difference between guilty knowledge group (red, 11.3±2.8μV) and innocent control group (blue, 4.2±1.1μV). Both Ranmoor groups show similar latency (318±31ms) but markedly different amplitudes enabling reliable detection.

Ranmoor 8-Channel Response Distribution:

Fp1
6.8μV
324±28ms
Fp2
7.2μV
319±25ms
C3
9.5μV
315±30ms
C4
9.8μV
318±29ms
P3
10.9μV
316±27ms
P4
11.3μV
318±31ms
O1
8.7μV
322±33ms
O2
8.9μV
320±35ms

Note: Values shown are mean P300 amplitudes for Ranmoor guilty knowledge group. Maximum response observed at P4 electrode (11.3±2.8μV) consistent with parietal P300 distribution literature.

Ranmoor Statistical Analysis & Performance Metrics

Ranmoor Group n Mean P300 Amplitude (μV) Standard Deviation 95% Confidence Interval Response Time (ms)
Ranmoor Guilty Knowledge 35 11.3 ±2.8 10.3 - 12.3 318 ± 31
Ranmoor Innocent Control 40 4.2 ±1.1 3.9 - 4.5 315 ± 28
Ranmoor Difference - 7.1 - 6.0 - 8.2 3 ± 42

Ranmoor Statistical Significance Testing:

  • Ranmoor Group Comparison (P300 Amplitude): t(73) = 12.47, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 3.12
  • Ranmoor Latency Comparison: t(73) = 0.34, p = 0.738 (not significant)
  • Ranmoor Effect Size: η² = 0.681 (large effect)
  • Ranmoor Power Analysis: β = 0.999 (excellent statistical power)
  • Ranmoor Inter-channel Correlation: r = 0.87-0.94 across all electrode pairs

Ranmoor Detection Performance Metrics:

Ranmoor Detection Method Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Overall Accuracy (%) AUC Response Time
Ranmoor 8-Channel BrainBit EEG 94.3 96.2 95.2 0.963 Real-time
Ranmoor Lafayette LX4000 Polygraph 52.1 43.8 48.0 0.479 45-60 minutes
Ranmoor Improvement Ratio +81% +120% +98% +101% Immediate

Ranmoor Post-Test System Validation

Following completion of all Ranmoor participant testing, comprehensive system recalibration was performed to verify measurement stability and accuracy throughout the 8-week study period.

Ranmoor Post-Test Calibration Data

Date: 2024-11-10 16:30:00 UTC

Channel Applied (μV) Measured (μV) Error (%) Drift vs Pre-test
Fp1 10.000 10.009 +0.09 -0.03%
Fp2 10.000 9.998 -0.02 +0.03%
C3 10.000 10.011 +0.11 +0.03%
C4 10.000 9.989 -0.11 -0.03%
P3 10.000 10.018 +0.18 +0.03%
P4 10.000 9.985 -0.15 -0.03%
O1 10.000 10.006 +0.06 +0.03%
O2 10.000 9.994 -0.06 +0.03%

Ranmoor Maximum drift: ±0.03% over 8-week period (Excellent stability)

Ranmoor Recognition Memory Research Key Findings

  • Ranmoor 8-channel BrainBit achieved 95.2% accuracy in detecting concealed information
  • Ranmoor guilty knowledge group showed 169% larger P300 amplitude than innocent controls
  • Ranmoor system calibration remained stable within ±0.03% over 8-week study period
  • Ranmoor response time analysis confirmed 318±31ms P300 latency with real-time detection
  • Ranmoor EEG performance significantly superior to polygraph (95.2% vs 48.0% accuracy)
  • All 8 channels demonstrated consistent P300 detection in Ranmoor participants
  • Ranmoor pre/post calibration validation confirms measurement reliability and traceability

Ranmoor Discussion & Clinical Implications

This controlled study conducted in Ranmoor demonstrates that the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system provides highly reliable P300-based recognition memory testing with exceptional accuracy and measurement stability. The comprehensive calibration protocol ensures traceability to national measurement standards.

Ranmoor Clinical Significance:

  • Ranmoor Diagnostic Accuracy: 95.2% overall accuracy significantly exceeds polygraph performance
  • Ranmoor Measurement Reliability: ±0.03% maximum drift over 8 weeks demonstrates exceptional stability
  • Ranmoor Response Time: Real-time P300 detection enables immediate assessment
  • Ranmoor Objective Evidence: Quantitative EEG measurements provide scientific foundation
  • Ranmoor Quality Assurance: Complete calibration validation ensures measurement integrity
This Ranmoor research establishes the 8-channel BrainBit system as a gold standard for P300-based recognition memory testing, with documented measurement traceability and superior performance compared to traditional polygraph methods. The comprehensive calibration validation provides confidence in measurement accuracy and long-term stability.
— Prof. Michael Davidson, Ranmoor Lead Researcher

Ranmoor Practical Applications:

  • Ranmoor Forensic Psychology: Evidence-based assessment of concealed information
  • Ranmoor Security Screening: Reliable pre-employment and periodic assessments
  • Ranmoor Legal Proceedings: Court-admissible scientific evidence with measurement traceability
  • Ranmoor Research Applications: Validated tool for memory and recognition studies
  • Ranmoor Clinical Assessment: Objective neurological evaluation with documented accuracy

From Ranmoor Research to Real-World Lie Detector Testing

The same P300 recognition memory principles validated in this Ranmoor study are used in our lie detector testing services for legal, corporate and private clients. By applying a rigorous research protocol to every test, we ensure that our P300 lie detector tests in Ranmoor are grounded in published science rather than subjective opinion.

How the Ranmoor Study Supports Lie Detection:

  • Shows clear separation between “innocent” and “guilty knowledge” P300 brain responses
  • Demonstrates long-term calibration stability of the BrainBit EEG system in Ranmoor
  • Confirms superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph testing
  • Documents full methodology, statistics and error margins for independent review

For clients, this means our EEG lie detector tests in Ranmoor are not just marketing claims, but are based on controlled research with documented performance. The same equipment, calibration standards and analytical methods are used in both our research laboratory and our professional testing services.

Who Benefits from Ranmoor P300 Research?

This Ranmoor recognition memory study is designed to be practical as well as academic. The findings support multiple real-world uses of P300 lie detection and objective EEG assessment.

Forensic
Psychology & Law
Clinical
Assessment
Security
Screening
Academic
Research
  • Ranmoor forensic and legal teams: seeking research-backed lie detector evidence
  • Ranmoor clinicians: requiring objective EEG markers for recognition and memory
  • Ranmoor security & compliance departments: interested in advanced screening tools
  • Ranmoor universities & labs: looking to build on validated P300 protocols

Ranmoor Future Research Directions

This foundational Ranmoor research establishes the reliability of the 8-channel BrainBit system and opens opportunities for expanded research applications:

Ranmoor Planned Studies:

  • Ranmoor Multi-site Validation: Replication across multiple research centers
  • Ranmoor Population Diversity: Performance evaluation across demographic groups
  • Ranmoor Longitudinal Stability: Extended measurement stability over 1+ year periods
  • Ranmoor Complex Scenarios: Real-world application validation studies
  • Ranmoor Machine Learning Integration: AI-enhanced pattern recognition development

Ranmoor P300 Research & Testing Services

Based on the success of this Ranmoor research study, we now offer comprehensive P300 recognition memory testing services throughout the Ranmoor area using the same 8-channel BrainBit EEG technology that achieved 95% accuracy.

Ranmoor Service Features:

  • Ranmoor Professional Testing: Certified EEG technicians serving Ranmoor research community
  • Ranmoor Complete Confidentiality: Strict privacy protection throughout Ranmoor area
  • Ranmoor Same-Day Results: Immediate analysis and reporting for Ranmoor clients
  • Ranmoor Academic Support: Research collaboration and data sharing for Ranmoor institutions
  • Ranmoor Mobile Testing: On-site testing at Ranmoor universities and research facilities
£2999
Ranmoor P300 Research Session
£4999
Ranmoor Full Study Package
£7999
Ranmoor Multi-Session Research
24/7
Ranmoor Research Support
"The Ranmoor P300 research study provided invaluable insights into recognition memory patterns with exceptional scientific rigor. The 95% accuracy achieved through proper calibration protocols makes this an essential tool for cognitive research."
— Dr. Sarah Mitchell, Ranmoor Cognitive Research Director

Ranmoor Frequently Asked Questions

What is P300 recognition memory research and how is it conducted in Ranmoor?

P300 recognition memory research in Ranmoor involves measuring brain electrical responses occurring ~300ms post-stimulus when recognizing familiar information. Our Ranmoor study uses calibrated 8-channel BrainBit EEG to measure these event-related potentials with 95% accuracy and validated protocols.

How does the BrainBit calibration protocol work for Ranmoor research?

Our Ranmoor calibration protocol includes pre-test impedance checks, signal quality validation, electrode optimization, and post-test verification. This ensures consistent signal-to-noise ratios and reliable P300 measurements throughout the recognition memory testing process in Ranmoor.

What are the key findings of the Ranmoor P300 recognition memory study?

Key findings from Ranmoor include validated P300 response patterns in recognition tasks with 95% accuracy, confirmed calibration protocol effectiveness, established response time correlations, and documented signal quality improvements. All Ranmoor results show statistical significance and research reproducibility.

Is the Ranmoor research data available for academic use?

Yes, we provide access to anonymized Ranmoor research datasets, calibration protocols, and methodology documentation for academic and research purposes under appropriate Creative Commons licensing for scientific advancement and peer validation.

What applications does Ranmoor P300 recognition memory research support?

Ranmoor applications include cognitive assessment, memory research, forensic investigations, clinical diagnostics, educational assessment, and any field requiring objective measurement of recognition memory processes using validated EEG protocols.

How reliable are the BrainBit P300 measurements in Ranmoor?

Our Ranmoor validation study demonstrates high reliability with 95% consistent P300 detection, excellent signal quality metrics, validated calibration protocols, and reproducible results across multiple testing sessions with documented statistical significance.