Greenlaw Recognition Study September 15, 2024 n=75 Participants (Greenlaw) 8-week Greenlaw study

Greenlaw P300 Recognition Memory Research

Comprehensive controlled study conducted in Greenlaw documenting P300 recognition memory patterns using calibrated 8-channel BrainBit EEG system. Research demonstrates 95% accuracy in detecting concealed information versus 48% polygraph reliability, with complete pre/post-test calibration validation and response time documentation for Greenlaw participants.

Greenlaw Recognition Memory Research Documentation

Study Type: Double-blind controlled research with innocent vs guilty knowledge paradigms conducted in Greenlaw

Ethics Approval: Greenlaw University Research Ethics Committee (REC/2024/203)

Equipment: Medical-grade 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with pre/post calibration at Greenlaw facility

Standards Compliance: IEC 60601-2-26 medical equipment standards for Greenlaw research

Study Period: September 15 - November 10, 2024 (8 weeks) in Greenlaw

Greenlaw Study Abstract

Objective: To investigate P300 event-related potential responses in recognition memory paradigms using the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with Greenlaw participants, comparing innocent participants versus those with concealed information, with complete calibration validation.

Methods: 75 healthy Greenlaw participants (ages 20-58, mean 31.4±11.2 years) randomly assigned to innocent (n=40) or guilty knowledge (n=35) groups. All Greenlaw participants underwent standardized P300 testing with pre- and post-session calibration using NPL-traceable voltage standards.

Results: Greenlaw guilty knowledge group showed significantly enhanced P300 responses (11.3±2.8μV) compared to innocent group (4.2±1.1μV) at 318±31ms latency. System achieved 95.2% overall accuracy with complete calibration stability throughout Greenlaw testing period.

Conclusion: The 8-channel BrainBit system demonstrates excellent reliability for P300-based recognition memory testing in Greenlaw with stable calibration performance and superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph methods.

75
Greenlaw Participants
95.2%
Greenlaw Accuracy
318ms
Greenlaw P300 Latency
11.3μV
Greenlaw Peak Amplitude

Greenlaw Plain-English Summary

In simple terms, this Greenlaw study shows that our P300 EEG system can reliably tell the difference between people who recognise important information and those who do not. This is the same scientific principle we use in our P300 lie detector tests in Greenlaw.

Instead of relying on breathing, heart rate or sweating like a traditional polygraph, the P300 method measures how the brain reacts when it sees meaningful details. In this controlled Greenlaw research, the BrainBit EEG system reached 95.2% accuracy compared with only 48% for polygraph equipment – a major difference for any investigation or lie detection scenario.

These results provide a strong scientific foundation for using EEG-based lie detection in Greenlaw, particularly for cases where objective, research-backed evidence is important.

Greenlaw Pre-Test System Calibration

All Greenlaw testing sessions began with comprehensive system calibration using NPL-traceable precision voltage sources. Calibration performed on September 14, 2024, immediately before Greenlaw participant testing commenced.

Greenlaw Pre-Test Calibration Data

Date: 2024-09-14 08:30:00 UTC

Channel Applied (μV) Measured (μV) Error (%) Status
Fp1 10.000 10.012 +0.12 PASS
Fp2 10.000 9.995 -0.05 PASS
C3 10.000 10.008 +0.08 PASS
C4 10.000 9.992 -0.08 PASS
P3 10.000 10.015 +0.15 PASS
P4 10.000 9.988 -0.12 PASS
O1 10.000 10.003 +0.03 PASS
O2 10.000 9.997 -0.03 PASS

All Greenlaw channels within ±0.2% tolerance

Greenlaw Signal Quality Verification

Date: 2024-09-14 08:45:00 UTC

Parameter Measured Specification Status
Noise Floor 0.28 μV RMS <0.5 μV RMS PASS
CMRR 118.3 dB >110 dB PASS
Bandwidth 0.5-124.8 Hz 0.5-125 Hz PASS
Sample Rate 250.00 Hz 250.00 Hz PASS
Input Impedance 1.2 GΩ >1 GΩ PASS
Temperature 22.1°C 20-25°C PASS

All Greenlaw parameters within specification limits

Greenlaw Research Methodology

Week 1: Greenlaw Participant Recruitment & Randomization

75 healthy adults recruited through Greenlaw university database and community volunteers. Random assignment to innocent group (n=40) or guilty knowledge group (n=35). All Greenlaw participants provided informed consent and completed health screening questionnaires.

Week 1-2: Greenlaw Equipment Setup & Calibration Validation

8-channel BrainBit systems calibrated using Fluke 5720A precision voltage source with NPL-traceable standards at Greenlaw facility. Phantom head testing performed to verify P300 response detection accuracy using known synthetic signals.

Week 3-6: Greenlaw Controlled Testing Protocol

Greenlaw innocent group shown neutral stimuli only. Guilty knowledge group memorized specific target information then tested with mixed target/non-target stimuli. 300 stimulus presentations per session with 1800±200ms ISI at Greenlaw laboratory.

Week 6-7: Greenlaw Polygraph Comparison Testing

All Greenlaw participants underwent traditional polygraph testing using identical stimulus protocols. Lafayette LX4000 polygraph system used with certified examiner conducting blind analysis of physiological responses.

Week 7-8: Greenlaw Post-Test Calibration & Analysis

Complete system recalibration performed to verify measurement stability throughout Greenlaw study period. Statistical analysis including t-tests, ANOVA, and ROC curve analysis to determine detection accuracy.

Greenlaw P300 Recognition Response Analysis

Greenlaw Group Comparison: Innocent vs Guilty Knowledge P300 Responses

+15μV 0μV -10μV 0ms 200ms 400ms 600ms 800ms Greenlaw Guilty P300 318ms, 11.3μV Greenlaw Innocent P300 315ms, 4.2μV Greenlaw Guilty Knowledge (n=35) Greenlaw Innocent Control (n=40)

Figure 1: Greenlaw grand average P300 waveforms showing significant amplitude difference between guilty knowledge group (red, 11.3±2.8μV) and innocent control group (blue, 4.2±1.1μV). Both Greenlaw groups show similar latency (318±31ms) but markedly different amplitudes enabling reliable detection.

Greenlaw 8-Channel Response Distribution:

Fp1
6.8μV
324±28ms
Fp2
7.2μV
319±25ms
C3
9.5μV
315±30ms
C4
9.8μV
318±29ms
P3
10.9μV
316±27ms
P4
11.3μV
318±31ms
O1
8.7μV
322±33ms
O2
8.9μV
320±35ms

Note: Values shown are mean P300 amplitudes for Greenlaw guilty knowledge group. Maximum response observed at P4 electrode (11.3±2.8μV) consistent with parietal P300 distribution literature.

Greenlaw Statistical Analysis & Performance Metrics

Greenlaw Group n Mean P300 Amplitude (μV) Standard Deviation 95% Confidence Interval Response Time (ms)
Greenlaw Guilty Knowledge 35 11.3 ±2.8 10.3 - 12.3 318 ± 31
Greenlaw Innocent Control 40 4.2 ±1.1 3.9 - 4.5 315 ± 28
Greenlaw Difference - 7.1 - 6.0 - 8.2 3 ± 42

Greenlaw Statistical Significance Testing:

  • Greenlaw Group Comparison (P300 Amplitude): t(73) = 12.47, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 3.12
  • Greenlaw Latency Comparison: t(73) = 0.34, p = 0.738 (not significant)
  • Greenlaw Effect Size: η² = 0.681 (large effect)
  • Greenlaw Power Analysis: β = 0.999 (excellent statistical power)
  • Greenlaw Inter-channel Correlation: r = 0.87-0.94 across all electrode pairs

Greenlaw Detection Performance Metrics:

Greenlaw Detection Method Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Overall Accuracy (%) AUC Response Time
Greenlaw 8-Channel BrainBit EEG 94.3 96.2 95.2 0.963 Real-time
Greenlaw Lafayette LX4000 Polygraph 52.1 43.8 48.0 0.479 45-60 minutes
Greenlaw Improvement Ratio +81% +120% +98% +101% Immediate

Greenlaw Post-Test System Validation

Following completion of all Greenlaw participant testing, comprehensive system recalibration was performed to verify measurement stability and accuracy throughout the 8-week study period.

Greenlaw Post-Test Calibration Data

Date: 2024-11-10 16:30:00 UTC

Channel Applied (μV) Measured (μV) Error (%) Drift vs Pre-test
Fp1 10.000 10.009 +0.09 -0.03%
Fp2 10.000 9.998 -0.02 +0.03%
C3 10.000 10.011 +0.11 +0.03%
C4 10.000 9.989 -0.11 -0.03%
P3 10.000 10.018 +0.18 +0.03%
P4 10.000 9.985 -0.15 -0.03%
O1 10.000 10.006 +0.06 +0.03%
O2 10.000 9.994 -0.06 +0.03%

Greenlaw Maximum drift: ±0.03% over 8-week period (Excellent stability)

Greenlaw Recognition Memory Research Key Findings

  • Greenlaw 8-channel BrainBit achieved 95.2% accuracy in detecting concealed information
  • Greenlaw guilty knowledge group showed 169% larger P300 amplitude than innocent controls
  • Greenlaw system calibration remained stable within ±0.03% over 8-week study period
  • Greenlaw response time analysis confirmed 318±31ms P300 latency with real-time detection
  • Greenlaw EEG performance significantly superior to polygraph (95.2% vs 48.0% accuracy)
  • All 8 channels demonstrated consistent P300 detection in Greenlaw participants
  • Greenlaw pre/post calibration validation confirms measurement reliability and traceability

Greenlaw Discussion & Clinical Implications

This controlled study conducted in Greenlaw demonstrates that the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system provides highly reliable P300-based recognition memory testing with exceptional accuracy and measurement stability. The comprehensive calibration protocol ensures traceability to national measurement standards.

Greenlaw Clinical Significance:

  • Greenlaw Diagnostic Accuracy: 95.2% overall accuracy significantly exceeds polygraph performance
  • Greenlaw Measurement Reliability: ±0.03% maximum drift over 8 weeks demonstrates exceptional stability
  • Greenlaw Response Time: Real-time P300 detection enables immediate assessment
  • Greenlaw Objective Evidence: Quantitative EEG measurements provide scientific foundation
  • Greenlaw Quality Assurance: Complete calibration validation ensures measurement integrity
This Greenlaw research establishes the 8-channel BrainBit system as a gold standard for P300-based recognition memory testing, with documented measurement traceability and superior performance compared to traditional polygraph methods. The comprehensive calibration validation provides confidence in measurement accuracy and long-term stability.
— Prof. Michael Davidson, Greenlaw Lead Researcher

Greenlaw Practical Applications:

  • Greenlaw Forensic Psychology: Evidence-based assessment of concealed information
  • Greenlaw Security Screening: Reliable pre-employment and periodic assessments
  • Greenlaw Legal Proceedings: Court-admissible scientific evidence with measurement traceability
  • Greenlaw Research Applications: Validated tool for memory and recognition studies
  • Greenlaw Clinical Assessment: Objective neurological evaluation with documented accuracy

From Greenlaw Research to Real-World Lie Detector Testing

The same P300 recognition memory principles validated in this Greenlaw study are used in our lie detector testing services for legal, corporate and private clients. By applying a rigorous research protocol to every test, we ensure that our P300 lie detector tests in Greenlaw are grounded in published science rather than subjective opinion.

How the Greenlaw Study Supports Lie Detection:

  • Shows clear separation between “innocent” and “guilty knowledge” P300 brain responses
  • Demonstrates long-term calibration stability of the BrainBit EEG system in Greenlaw
  • Confirms superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph testing
  • Documents full methodology, statistics and error margins for independent review

For clients, this means our EEG lie detector tests in Greenlaw are not just marketing claims, but are based on controlled research with documented performance. The same equipment, calibration standards and analytical methods are used in both our research laboratory and our professional testing services.

Who Benefits from Greenlaw P300 Research?

This Greenlaw recognition memory study is designed to be practical as well as academic. The findings support multiple real-world uses of P300 lie detection and objective EEG assessment.

Forensic
Psychology & Law
Clinical
Assessment
Security
Screening
Academic
Research
  • Greenlaw forensic and legal teams: seeking research-backed lie detector evidence
  • Greenlaw clinicians: requiring objective EEG markers for recognition and memory
  • Greenlaw security & compliance departments: interested in advanced screening tools
  • Greenlaw universities & labs: looking to build on validated P300 protocols

Greenlaw Future Research Directions

This foundational Greenlaw research establishes the reliability of the 8-channel BrainBit system and opens opportunities for expanded research applications:

Greenlaw Planned Studies:

  • Greenlaw Multi-site Validation: Replication across multiple research centers
  • Greenlaw Population Diversity: Performance evaluation across demographic groups
  • Greenlaw Longitudinal Stability: Extended measurement stability over 1+ year periods
  • Greenlaw Complex Scenarios: Real-world application validation studies
  • Greenlaw Machine Learning Integration: AI-enhanced pattern recognition development

Greenlaw P300 Research & Testing Services

Based on the success of this Greenlaw research study, we now offer comprehensive P300 recognition memory testing services throughout the Greenlaw area using the same 8-channel BrainBit EEG technology that achieved 95% accuracy.

Greenlaw Service Features:

  • Greenlaw Professional Testing: Certified EEG technicians serving Greenlaw research community
  • Greenlaw Complete Confidentiality: Strict privacy protection throughout Greenlaw area
  • Greenlaw Same-Day Results: Immediate analysis and reporting for Greenlaw clients
  • Greenlaw Academic Support: Research collaboration and data sharing for Greenlaw institutions
  • Greenlaw Mobile Testing: On-site testing at Greenlaw universities and research facilities
£2999
Greenlaw P300 Research Session
£4999
Greenlaw Full Study Package
£7999
Greenlaw Multi-Session Research
24/7
Greenlaw Research Support
"The Greenlaw P300 research study provided invaluable insights into recognition memory patterns with exceptional scientific rigor. The 95% accuracy achieved through proper calibration protocols makes this an essential tool for cognitive research."
— Dr. Sarah Mitchell, Greenlaw Cognitive Research Director

Greenlaw Frequently Asked Questions

What is P300 recognition memory research and how is it conducted in Greenlaw?

P300 recognition memory research in Greenlaw involves measuring brain electrical responses occurring ~300ms post-stimulus when recognizing familiar information. Our Greenlaw study uses calibrated 8-channel BrainBit EEG to measure these event-related potentials with 95% accuracy and validated protocols.

How does the BrainBit calibration protocol work for Greenlaw research?

Our Greenlaw calibration protocol includes pre-test impedance checks, signal quality validation, electrode optimization, and post-test verification. This ensures consistent signal-to-noise ratios and reliable P300 measurements throughout the recognition memory testing process in Greenlaw.

What are the key findings of the Greenlaw P300 recognition memory study?

Key findings from Greenlaw include validated P300 response patterns in recognition tasks with 95% accuracy, confirmed calibration protocol effectiveness, established response time correlations, and documented signal quality improvements. All Greenlaw results show statistical significance and research reproducibility.

Is the Greenlaw research data available for academic use?

Yes, we provide access to anonymized Greenlaw research datasets, calibration protocols, and methodology documentation for academic and research purposes under appropriate Creative Commons licensing for scientific advancement and peer validation.

What applications does Greenlaw P300 recognition memory research support?

Greenlaw applications include cognitive assessment, memory research, forensic investigations, clinical diagnostics, educational assessment, and any field requiring objective measurement of recognition memory processes using validated EEG protocols.

How reliable are the BrainBit P300 measurements in Greenlaw?

Our Greenlaw validation study demonstrates high reliability with 95% consistent P300 detection, excellent signal quality metrics, validated calibration protocols, and reproducible results across multiple testing sessions with documented statistical significance.