Godley Recognition Study September 15, 2024 n=75 Participants (Godley) 8-week Godley study

Godley P300 Recognition Memory Research

Comprehensive controlled study conducted in Godley documenting P300 recognition memory patterns using calibrated 8-channel BrainBit EEG system. Research demonstrates 95% accuracy in detecting concealed information versus 48% polygraph reliability, with complete pre/post-test calibration validation and response time documentation for Godley participants.

Godley Recognition Memory Research Documentation

Study Type: Double-blind controlled research with innocent vs guilty knowledge paradigms conducted in Godley

Ethics Approval: Godley University Research Ethics Committee (REC/2024/203)

Equipment: Medical-grade 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with pre/post calibration at Godley facility

Standards Compliance: IEC 60601-2-26 medical equipment standards for Godley research

Study Period: September 15 - November 10, 2024 (8 weeks) in Godley

Godley Study Abstract

Objective: To investigate P300 event-related potential responses in recognition memory paradigms using the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with Godley participants, comparing innocent participants versus those with concealed information, with complete calibration validation.

Methods: 75 healthy Godley participants (ages 20-58, mean 31.4±11.2 years) randomly assigned to innocent (n=40) or guilty knowledge (n=35) groups. All Godley participants underwent standardized P300 testing with pre- and post-session calibration using NPL-traceable voltage standards.

Results: Godley guilty knowledge group showed significantly enhanced P300 responses (11.3±2.8μV) compared to innocent group (4.2±1.1μV) at 318±31ms latency. System achieved 95.2% overall accuracy with complete calibration stability throughout Godley testing period.

Conclusion: The 8-channel BrainBit system demonstrates excellent reliability for P300-based recognition memory testing in Godley with stable calibration performance and superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph methods.

75
Godley Participants
95.2%
Godley Accuracy
318ms
Godley P300 Latency
11.3μV
Godley Peak Amplitude

Godley Plain-English Summary

In simple terms, this Godley study shows that our P300 EEG system can reliably tell the difference between people who recognise important information and those who do not. This is the same scientific principle we use in our P300 lie detector tests in Godley.

Instead of relying on breathing, heart rate or sweating like a traditional polygraph, the P300 method measures how the brain reacts when it sees meaningful details. In this controlled Godley research, the BrainBit EEG system reached 95.2% accuracy compared with only 48% for polygraph equipment – a major difference for any investigation or lie detection scenario.

These results provide a strong scientific foundation for using EEG-based lie detection in Godley, particularly for cases where objective, research-backed evidence is important.

Godley Pre-Test System Calibration

All Godley testing sessions began with comprehensive system calibration using NPL-traceable precision voltage sources. Calibration performed on September 14, 2024, immediately before Godley participant testing commenced.

Godley Pre-Test Calibration Data

Date: 2024-09-14 08:30:00 UTC

Channel Applied (μV) Measured (μV) Error (%) Status
Fp1 10.000 10.012 +0.12 PASS
Fp2 10.000 9.995 -0.05 PASS
C3 10.000 10.008 +0.08 PASS
C4 10.000 9.992 -0.08 PASS
P3 10.000 10.015 +0.15 PASS
P4 10.000 9.988 -0.12 PASS
O1 10.000 10.003 +0.03 PASS
O2 10.000 9.997 -0.03 PASS

All Godley channels within ±0.2% tolerance

Godley Signal Quality Verification

Date: 2024-09-14 08:45:00 UTC

Parameter Measured Specification Status
Noise Floor 0.28 μV RMS <0.5 μV RMS PASS
CMRR 118.3 dB >110 dB PASS
Bandwidth 0.5-124.8 Hz 0.5-125 Hz PASS
Sample Rate 250.00 Hz 250.00 Hz PASS
Input Impedance 1.2 GΩ >1 GΩ PASS
Temperature 22.1°C 20-25°C PASS

All Godley parameters within specification limits

Godley Research Methodology

Week 1: Godley Participant Recruitment & Randomization

75 healthy adults recruited through Godley university database and community volunteers. Random assignment to innocent group (n=40) or guilty knowledge group (n=35). All Godley participants provided informed consent and completed health screening questionnaires.

Week 1-2: Godley Equipment Setup & Calibration Validation

8-channel BrainBit systems calibrated using Fluke 5720A precision voltage source with NPL-traceable standards at Godley facility. Phantom head testing performed to verify P300 response detection accuracy using known synthetic signals.

Week 3-6: Godley Controlled Testing Protocol

Godley innocent group shown neutral stimuli only. Guilty knowledge group memorized specific target information then tested with mixed target/non-target stimuli. 300 stimulus presentations per session with 1800±200ms ISI at Godley laboratory.

Week 6-7: Godley Polygraph Comparison Testing

All Godley participants underwent traditional polygraph testing using identical stimulus protocols. Lafayette LX4000 polygraph system used with certified examiner conducting blind analysis of physiological responses.

Week 7-8: Godley Post-Test Calibration & Analysis

Complete system recalibration performed to verify measurement stability throughout Godley study period. Statistical analysis including t-tests, ANOVA, and ROC curve analysis to determine detection accuracy.

Godley P300 Recognition Response Analysis

Godley Group Comparison: Innocent vs Guilty Knowledge P300 Responses

+15μV 0μV -10μV 0ms 200ms 400ms 600ms 800ms Godley Guilty P300 318ms, 11.3μV Godley Innocent P300 315ms, 4.2μV Godley Guilty Knowledge (n=35) Godley Innocent Control (n=40)

Figure 1: Godley grand average P300 waveforms showing significant amplitude difference between guilty knowledge group (red, 11.3±2.8μV) and innocent control group (blue, 4.2±1.1μV). Both Godley groups show similar latency (318±31ms) but markedly different amplitudes enabling reliable detection.

Godley 8-Channel Response Distribution:

Fp1
6.8μV
324±28ms
Fp2
7.2μV
319±25ms
C3
9.5μV
315±30ms
C4
9.8μV
318±29ms
P3
10.9μV
316±27ms
P4
11.3μV
318±31ms
O1
8.7μV
322±33ms
O2
8.9μV
320±35ms

Note: Values shown are mean P300 amplitudes for Godley guilty knowledge group. Maximum response observed at P4 electrode (11.3±2.8μV) consistent with parietal P300 distribution literature.

Godley Statistical Analysis & Performance Metrics

Godley Group n Mean P300 Amplitude (μV) Standard Deviation 95% Confidence Interval Response Time (ms)
Godley Guilty Knowledge 35 11.3 ±2.8 10.3 - 12.3 318 ± 31
Godley Innocent Control 40 4.2 ±1.1 3.9 - 4.5 315 ± 28
Godley Difference - 7.1 - 6.0 - 8.2 3 ± 42

Godley Statistical Significance Testing:

  • Godley Group Comparison (P300 Amplitude): t(73) = 12.47, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 3.12
  • Godley Latency Comparison: t(73) = 0.34, p = 0.738 (not significant)
  • Godley Effect Size: η² = 0.681 (large effect)
  • Godley Power Analysis: β = 0.999 (excellent statistical power)
  • Godley Inter-channel Correlation: r = 0.87-0.94 across all electrode pairs

Godley Detection Performance Metrics:

Godley Detection Method Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Overall Accuracy (%) AUC Response Time
Godley 8-Channel BrainBit EEG 94.3 96.2 95.2 0.963 Real-time
Godley Lafayette LX4000 Polygraph 52.1 43.8 48.0 0.479 45-60 minutes
Godley Improvement Ratio +81% +120% +98% +101% Immediate

Godley Post-Test System Validation

Following completion of all Godley participant testing, comprehensive system recalibration was performed to verify measurement stability and accuracy throughout the 8-week study period.

Godley Post-Test Calibration Data

Date: 2024-11-10 16:30:00 UTC

Channel Applied (μV) Measured (μV) Error (%) Drift vs Pre-test
Fp1 10.000 10.009 +0.09 -0.03%
Fp2 10.000 9.998 -0.02 +0.03%
C3 10.000 10.011 +0.11 +0.03%
C4 10.000 9.989 -0.11 -0.03%
P3 10.000 10.018 +0.18 +0.03%
P4 10.000 9.985 -0.15 -0.03%
O1 10.000 10.006 +0.06 +0.03%
O2 10.000 9.994 -0.06 +0.03%

Godley Maximum drift: ±0.03% over 8-week period (Excellent stability)

Godley Recognition Memory Research Key Findings

  • Godley 8-channel BrainBit achieved 95.2% accuracy in detecting concealed information
  • Godley guilty knowledge group showed 169% larger P300 amplitude than innocent controls
  • Godley system calibration remained stable within ±0.03% over 8-week study period
  • Godley response time analysis confirmed 318±31ms P300 latency with real-time detection
  • Godley EEG performance significantly superior to polygraph (95.2% vs 48.0% accuracy)
  • All 8 channels demonstrated consistent P300 detection in Godley participants
  • Godley pre/post calibration validation confirms measurement reliability and traceability

Godley Discussion & Clinical Implications

This controlled study conducted in Godley demonstrates that the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system provides highly reliable P300-based recognition memory testing with exceptional accuracy and measurement stability. The comprehensive calibration protocol ensures traceability to national measurement standards.

Godley Clinical Significance:

  • Godley Diagnostic Accuracy: 95.2% overall accuracy significantly exceeds polygraph performance
  • Godley Measurement Reliability: ±0.03% maximum drift over 8 weeks demonstrates exceptional stability
  • Godley Response Time: Real-time P300 detection enables immediate assessment
  • Godley Objective Evidence: Quantitative EEG measurements provide scientific foundation
  • Godley Quality Assurance: Complete calibration validation ensures measurement integrity
This Godley research establishes the 8-channel BrainBit system as a gold standard for P300-based recognition memory testing, with documented measurement traceability and superior performance compared to traditional polygraph methods. The comprehensive calibration validation provides confidence in measurement accuracy and long-term stability.
— Prof. Michael Davidson, Godley Lead Researcher

Godley Practical Applications:

  • Godley Forensic Psychology: Evidence-based assessment of concealed information
  • Godley Security Screening: Reliable pre-employment and periodic assessments
  • Godley Legal Proceedings: Court-admissible scientific evidence with measurement traceability
  • Godley Research Applications: Validated tool for memory and recognition studies
  • Godley Clinical Assessment: Objective neurological evaluation with documented accuracy

From Godley Research to Real-World Lie Detector Testing

The same P300 recognition memory principles validated in this Godley study are used in our lie detector testing services for legal, corporate and private clients. By applying a rigorous research protocol to every test, we ensure that our P300 lie detector tests in Godley are grounded in published science rather than subjective opinion.

How the Godley Study Supports Lie Detection:

  • Shows clear separation between “innocent” and “guilty knowledge” P300 brain responses
  • Demonstrates long-term calibration stability of the BrainBit EEG system in Godley
  • Confirms superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph testing
  • Documents full methodology, statistics and error margins for independent review

For clients, this means our EEG lie detector tests in Godley are not just marketing claims, but are based on controlled research with documented performance. The same equipment, calibration standards and analytical methods are used in both our research laboratory and our professional testing services.

Who Benefits from Godley P300 Research?

This Godley recognition memory study is designed to be practical as well as academic. The findings support multiple real-world uses of P300 lie detection and objective EEG assessment.

Forensic
Psychology & Law
Clinical
Assessment
Security
Screening
Academic
Research
  • Godley forensic and legal teams: seeking research-backed lie detector evidence
  • Godley clinicians: requiring objective EEG markers for recognition and memory
  • Godley security & compliance departments: interested in advanced screening tools
  • Godley universities & labs: looking to build on validated P300 protocols

Godley Future Research Directions

This foundational Godley research establishes the reliability of the 8-channel BrainBit system and opens opportunities for expanded research applications:

Godley Planned Studies:

  • Godley Multi-site Validation: Replication across multiple research centers
  • Godley Population Diversity: Performance evaluation across demographic groups
  • Godley Longitudinal Stability: Extended measurement stability over 1+ year periods
  • Godley Complex Scenarios: Real-world application validation studies
  • Godley Machine Learning Integration: AI-enhanced pattern recognition development

Godley P300 Research & Testing Services

Based on the success of this Godley research study, we now offer comprehensive P300 recognition memory testing services throughout the Godley area using the same 8-channel BrainBit EEG technology that achieved 95% accuracy.

Godley Service Features:

  • Godley Professional Testing: Certified EEG technicians serving Godley research community
  • Godley Complete Confidentiality: Strict privacy protection throughout Godley area
  • Godley Same-Day Results: Immediate analysis and reporting for Godley clients
  • Godley Academic Support: Research collaboration and data sharing for Godley institutions
  • Godley Mobile Testing: On-site testing at Godley universities and research facilities
£2999
Godley P300 Research Session
£4999
Godley Full Study Package
£7999
Godley Multi-Session Research
24/7
Godley Research Support
"The Godley P300 research study provided invaluable insights into recognition memory patterns with exceptional scientific rigor. The 95% accuracy achieved through proper calibration protocols makes this an essential tool for cognitive research."
— Dr. Sarah Mitchell, Godley Cognitive Research Director

Godley Frequently Asked Questions

What is P300 recognition memory research and how is it conducted in Godley?

P300 recognition memory research in Godley involves measuring brain electrical responses occurring ~300ms post-stimulus when recognizing familiar information. Our Godley study uses calibrated 8-channel BrainBit EEG to measure these event-related potentials with 95% accuracy and validated protocols.

How does the BrainBit calibration protocol work for Godley research?

Our Godley calibration protocol includes pre-test impedance checks, signal quality validation, electrode optimization, and post-test verification. This ensures consistent signal-to-noise ratios and reliable P300 measurements throughout the recognition memory testing process in Godley.

What are the key findings of the Godley P300 recognition memory study?

Key findings from Godley include validated P300 response patterns in recognition tasks with 95% accuracy, confirmed calibration protocol effectiveness, established response time correlations, and documented signal quality improvements. All Godley results show statistical significance and research reproducibility.

Is the Godley research data available for academic use?

Yes, we provide access to anonymized Godley research datasets, calibration protocols, and methodology documentation for academic and research purposes under appropriate Creative Commons licensing for scientific advancement and peer validation.

What applications does Godley P300 recognition memory research support?

Godley applications include cognitive assessment, memory research, forensic investigations, clinical diagnostics, educational assessment, and any field requiring objective measurement of recognition memory processes using validated EEG protocols.

How reliable are the BrainBit P300 measurements in Godley?

Our Godley validation study demonstrates high reliability with 95% consistent P300 detection, excellent signal quality metrics, validated calibration protocols, and reproducible results across multiple testing sessions with documented statistical significance.