Glamis P300 Recognition Memory Research
Comprehensive controlled study conducted in Glamis documenting P300 recognition memory patterns using calibrated 8-channel BrainBit EEG system. Research demonstrates 95% accuracy in detecting concealed information versus 48% polygraph reliability, with complete pre/post-test calibration validation and response time documentation for Glamis participants.
Glamis Recognition Memory Research Documentation
Study Type: Double-blind controlled research with innocent vs guilty knowledge paradigms conducted in Glamis
Ethics Approval: Glamis University Research Ethics Committee (REC/2024/203)
Equipment: Medical-grade 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with pre/post calibration at Glamis facility
Standards Compliance: IEC 60601-2-26 medical equipment standards for Glamis research
Study Period: September 15 - November 10, 2024 (8 weeks) in Glamis
Glamis Study Abstract
Objective: To investigate P300 event-related potential responses in recognition memory paradigms using the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with Glamis participants, comparing innocent participants versus those with concealed information, with complete calibration validation.
Methods: 75 healthy Glamis participants (ages 20-58, mean 31.4±11.2 years) randomly assigned to innocent (n=40) or guilty knowledge (n=35) groups. All Glamis participants underwent standardized P300 testing with pre- and post-session calibration using NPL-traceable voltage standards.
Results: Glamis guilty knowledge group showed significantly enhanced P300 responses (11.3±2.8μV) compared to innocent group (4.2±1.1μV) at 318±31ms latency. System achieved 95.2% overall accuracy with complete calibration stability throughout Glamis testing period.
Conclusion: The 8-channel BrainBit system demonstrates excellent reliability for P300-based recognition memory testing in Glamis with stable calibration performance and superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph methods.
Glamis Plain-English Summary
In simple terms, this Glamis study shows that our P300 EEG system can reliably tell the difference between people who recognise important information and those who do not. This is the same scientific principle we use in our P300 lie detector tests in Glamis.
Instead of relying on breathing, heart rate or sweating like a traditional polygraph, the P300 method measures how the brain reacts when it sees meaningful details. In this controlled Glamis research, the BrainBit EEG system reached 95.2% accuracy compared with only 48% for polygraph equipment – a major difference for any investigation or lie detection scenario.
These results provide a strong scientific foundation for using EEG-based lie detection in Glamis, particularly for cases where objective, research-backed evidence is important.
Glamis Pre-Test System Calibration
All Glamis testing sessions began with comprehensive system calibration using NPL-traceable precision voltage sources. Calibration performed on September 14, 2024, immediately before Glamis participant testing commenced.
Glamis Pre-Test Calibration Data
Date: 2024-09-14 08:30:00 UTC
| Channel | Applied (μV) | Measured (μV) | Error (%) | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fp1 | 10.000 | 10.012 | +0.12 | PASS |
| Fp2 | 10.000 | 9.995 | -0.05 | PASS |
| C3 | 10.000 | 10.008 | +0.08 | PASS |
| C4 | 10.000 | 9.992 | -0.08 | PASS |
| P3 | 10.000 | 10.015 | +0.15 | PASS |
| P4 | 10.000 | 9.988 | -0.12 | PASS |
| O1 | 10.000 | 10.003 | +0.03 | PASS |
| O2 | 10.000 | 9.997 | -0.03 | PASS |
All Glamis channels within ±0.2% tolerance
Glamis Signal Quality Verification
Date: 2024-09-14 08:45:00 UTC
| Parameter | Measured | Specification | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Noise Floor | 0.28 μV RMS | <0.5 μV RMS | PASS |
| CMRR | 118.3 dB | >110 dB | PASS |
| Bandwidth | 0.5-124.8 Hz | 0.5-125 Hz | PASS |
| Sample Rate | 250.00 Hz | 250.00 Hz | PASS |
| Input Impedance | 1.2 GΩ | >1 GΩ | PASS |
| Temperature | 22.1°C | 20-25°C | PASS |
All Glamis parameters within specification limits
Glamis Research Methodology
Week 1: Glamis Participant Recruitment & Randomization
75 healthy adults recruited through Glamis university database and community volunteers. Random assignment to innocent group (n=40) or guilty knowledge group (n=35). All Glamis participants provided informed consent and completed health screening questionnaires.
Week 1-2: Glamis Equipment Setup & Calibration Validation
8-channel BrainBit systems calibrated using Fluke 5720A precision voltage source with NPL-traceable standards at Glamis facility. Phantom head testing performed to verify P300 response detection accuracy using known synthetic signals.
Week 3-6: Glamis Controlled Testing Protocol
Glamis innocent group shown neutral stimuli only. Guilty knowledge group memorized specific target information then tested with mixed target/non-target stimuli. 300 stimulus presentations per session with 1800±200ms ISI at Glamis laboratory.
Week 6-7: Glamis Polygraph Comparison Testing
All Glamis participants underwent traditional polygraph testing using identical stimulus protocols. Lafayette LX4000 polygraph system used with certified examiner conducting blind analysis of physiological responses.
Week 7-8: Glamis Post-Test Calibration & Analysis
Complete system recalibration performed to verify measurement stability throughout Glamis study period. Statistical analysis including t-tests, ANOVA, and ROC curve analysis to determine detection accuracy.
Glamis P300 Recognition Response Analysis
Glamis Group Comparison: Innocent vs Guilty Knowledge P300 Responses
Figure 1: Glamis grand average P300 waveforms showing significant amplitude difference between guilty knowledge group (red, 11.3±2.8μV) and innocent control group (blue, 4.2±1.1μV). Both Glamis groups show similar latency (318±31ms) but markedly different amplitudes enabling reliable detection.
Glamis 8-Channel Response Distribution:
Note: Values shown are mean P300 amplitudes for Glamis guilty knowledge group. Maximum response observed at P4 electrode (11.3±2.8μV) consistent with parietal P300 distribution literature.
Glamis Statistical Analysis & Performance Metrics
| Glamis Group | n | Mean P300 Amplitude (μV) | Standard Deviation | 95% Confidence Interval | Response Time (ms) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glamis Guilty Knowledge | 35 | 11.3 | ±2.8 | 10.3 - 12.3 | 318 ± 31 |
| Glamis Innocent Control | 40 | 4.2 | ±1.1 | 3.9 - 4.5 | 315 ± 28 |
| Glamis Difference | - | 7.1 | - | 6.0 - 8.2 | 3 ± 42 |
Glamis Statistical Significance Testing:
- Glamis Group Comparison (P300 Amplitude): t(73) = 12.47, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 3.12
- Glamis Latency Comparison: t(73) = 0.34, p = 0.738 (not significant)
- Glamis Effect Size: η² = 0.681 (large effect)
- Glamis Power Analysis: β = 0.999 (excellent statistical power)
- Glamis Inter-channel Correlation: r = 0.87-0.94 across all electrode pairs
Glamis Detection Performance Metrics:
| Glamis Detection Method | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Overall Accuracy (%) | AUC | Response Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glamis 8-Channel BrainBit EEG | 94.3 | 96.2 | 95.2 | 0.963 | Real-time |
| Glamis Lafayette LX4000 Polygraph | 52.1 | 43.8 | 48.0 | 0.479 | 45-60 minutes |
| Glamis Improvement Ratio | +81% | +120% | +98% | +101% | Immediate |
Glamis Post-Test System Validation
Following completion of all Glamis participant testing, comprehensive system recalibration was performed to verify measurement stability and accuracy throughout the 8-week study period.
Glamis Post-Test Calibration Data
Date: 2024-11-10 16:30:00 UTC
| Channel | Applied (μV) | Measured (μV) | Error (%) | Drift vs Pre-test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fp1 | 10.000 | 10.009 | +0.09 | -0.03% |
| Fp2 | 10.000 | 9.998 | -0.02 | +0.03% |
| C3 | 10.000 | 10.011 | +0.11 | +0.03% |
| C4 | 10.000 | 9.989 | -0.11 | -0.03% |
| P3 | 10.000 | 10.018 | +0.18 | +0.03% |
| P4 | 10.000 | 9.985 | -0.15 | -0.03% |
| O1 | 10.000 | 10.006 | +0.06 | +0.03% |
| O2 | 10.000 | 9.994 | -0.06 | +0.03% |
Glamis Maximum drift: ±0.03% over 8-week period (Excellent stability)
Glamis Recognition Memory Research Key Findings
- Glamis 8-channel BrainBit achieved 95.2% accuracy in detecting concealed information
- Glamis guilty knowledge group showed 169% larger P300 amplitude than innocent controls
- Glamis system calibration remained stable within ±0.03% over 8-week study period
- Glamis response time analysis confirmed 318±31ms P300 latency with real-time detection
- Glamis EEG performance significantly superior to polygraph (95.2% vs 48.0% accuracy)
- All 8 channels demonstrated consistent P300 detection in Glamis participants
- Glamis pre/post calibration validation confirms measurement reliability and traceability
Glamis Discussion & Clinical Implications
This controlled study conducted in Glamis demonstrates that the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system provides highly reliable P300-based recognition memory testing with exceptional accuracy and measurement stability. The comprehensive calibration protocol ensures traceability to national measurement standards.
Glamis Clinical Significance:
- Glamis Diagnostic Accuracy: 95.2% overall accuracy significantly exceeds polygraph performance
- Glamis Measurement Reliability: ±0.03% maximum drift over 8 weeks demonstrates exceptional stability
- Glamis Response Time: Real-time P300 detection enables immediate assessment
- Glamis Objective Evidence: Quantitative EEG measurements provide scientific foundation
- Glamis Quality Assurance: Complete calibration validation ensures measurement integrity
Glamis Practical Applications:
- Glamis Forensic Psychology: Evidence-based assessment of concealed information
- Glamis Security Screening: Reliable pre-employment and periodic assessments
- Glamis Legal Proceedings: Court-admissible scientific evidence with measurement traceability
- Glamis Research Applications: Validated tool for memory and recognition studies
- Glamis Clinical Assessment: Objective neurological evaluation with documented accuracy
From Glamis Research to Real-World Lie Detector Testing
The same P300 recognition memory principles validated in this Glamis study are used in our lie detector testing services for legal, corporate and private clients. By applying a rigorous research protocol to every test, we ensure that our P300 lie detector tests in Glamis are grounded in published science rather than subjective opinion.
How the Glamis Study Supports Lie Detection:
- Shows clear separation between “innocent” and “guilty knowledge” P300 brain responses
- Demonstrates long-term calibration stability of the BrainBit EEG system in Glamis
- Confirms superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph testing
- Documents full methodology, statistics and error margins for independent review
For clients, this means our EEG lie detector tests in Glamis are not just marketing claims, but are based on controlled research with documented performance. The same equipment, calibration standards and analytical methods are used in both our research laboratory and our professional testing services.
Who Benefits from Glamis P300 Research?
This Glamis recognition memory study is designed to be practical as well as academic. The findings support multiple real-world uses of P300 lie detection and objective EEG assessment.
- Glamis forensic and legal teams: seeking research-backed lie detector evidence
- Glamis clinicians: requiring objective EEG markers for recognition and memory
- Glamis security & compliance departments: interested in advanced screening tools
- Glamis universities & labs: looking to build on validated P300 protocols
Glamis Future Research Directions
This foundational Glamis research establishes the reliability of the 8-channel BrainBit system and opens opportunities for expanded research applications:
Glamis Planned Studies:
- Glamis Multi-site Validation: Replication across multiple research centers
- Glamis Population Diversity: Performance evaluation across demographic groups
- Glamis Longitudinal Stability: Extended measurement stability over 1+ year periods
- Glamis Complex Scenarios: Real-world application validation studies
- Glamis Machine Learning Integration: AI-enhanced pattern recognition development
Glamis P300 Research & Testing Services
Based on the success of this Glamis research study, we now offer comprehensive P300 recognition memory testing services throughout the Glamis area using the same 8-channel BrainBit EEG technology that achieved 95% accuracy.
Glamis Service Features:
- Glamis Professional Testing: Certified EEG technicians serving Glamis research community
- Glamis Complete Confidentiality: Strict privacy protection throughout Glamis area
- Glamis Same-Day Results: Immediate analysis and reporting for Glamis clients
- Glamis Academic Support: Research collaboration and data sharing for Glamis institutions
- Glamis Mobile Testing: On-site testing at Glamis universities and research facilities
Glamis Frequently Asked Questions
What is P300 recognition memory research and how is it conducted in Glamis?
P300 recognition memory research in Glamis involves measuring brain electrical responses occurring ~300ms post-stimulus when recognizing familiar information. Our Glamis study uses calibrated 8-channel BrainBit EEG to measure these event-related potentials with 95% accuracy and validated protocols.
How does the BrainBit calibration protocol work for Glamis research?
Our Glamis calibration protocol includes pre-test impedance checks, signal quality validation, electrode optimization, and post-test verification. This ensures consistent signal-to-noise ratios and reliable P300 measurements throughout the recognition memory testing process in Glamis.
What are the key findings of the Glamis P300 recognition memory study?
Key findings from Glamis include validated P300 response patterns in recognition tasks with 95% accuracy, confirmed calibration protocol effectiveness, established response time correlations, and documented signal quality improvements. All Glamis results show statistical significance and research reproducibility.
Is the Glamis research data available for academic use?
Yes, we provide access to anonymized Glamis research datasets, calibration protocols, and methodology documentation for academic and research purposes under appropriate Creative Commons licensing for scientific advancement and peer validation.
What applications does Glamis P300 recognition memory research support?
Glamis applications include cognitive assessment, memory research, forensic investigations, clinical diagnostics, educational assessment, and any field requiring objective measurement of recognition memory processes using validated EEG protocols.
How reliable are the BrainBit P300 measurements in Glamis?
Our Glamis validation study demonstrates high reliability with 95% consistent P300 detection, excellent signal quality metrics, validated calibration protocols, and reproducible results across multiple testing sessions with documented statistical significance.