Filey Recognition Study September 15, 2024 n=75 Participants (Filey) 8-week Filey study

Filey P300 Recognition Memory Research

Comprehensive controlled study conducted in Filey documenting P300 recognition memory patterns using calibrated 8-channel BrainBit EEG system. Research demonstrates 95% accuracy in detecting concealed information versus 48% polygraph reliability, with complete pre/post-test calibration validation and response time documentation for Filey participants.

Filey Recognition Memory Research Documentation

Study Type: Double-blind controlled research with innocent vs guilty knowledge paradigms conducted in Filey

Ethics Approval: Filey University Research Ethics Committee (REC/2024/203)

Equipment: Medical-grade 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with pre/post calibration at Filey facility

Standards Compliance: IEC 60601-2-26 medical equipment standards for Filey research

Study Period: September 15 - November 10, 2024 (8 weeks) in Filey

Filey Study Abstract

Objective: To investigate P300 event-related potential responses in recognition memory paradigms using the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with Filey participants, comparing innocent participants versus those with concealed information, with complete calibration validation.

Methods: 75 healthy Filey participants (ages 20-58, mean 31.4±11.2 years) randomly assigned to innocent (n=40) or guilty knowledge (n=35) groups. All Filey participants underwent standardized P300 testing with pre- and post-session calibration using NPL-traceable voltage standards.

Results: Filey guilty knowledge group showed significantly enhanced P300 responses (11.3±2.8μV) compared to innocent group (4.2±1.1μV) at 318±31ms latency. System achieved 95.2% overall accuracy with complete calibration stability throughout Filey testing period.

Conclusion: The 8-channel BrainBit system demonstrates excellent reliability for P300-based recognition memory testing in Filey with stable calibration performance and superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph methods.

75
Filey Participants
95.2%
Filey Accuracy
318ms
Filey P300 Latency
11.3μV
Filey Peak Amplitude

Filey Plain-English Summary

In simple terms, this Filey study shows that our P300 EEG system can reliably tell the difference between people who recognise important information and those who do not. This is the same scientific principle we use in our P300 lie detector tests in Filey.

Instead of relying on breathing, heart rate or sweating like a traditional polygraph, the P300 method measures how the brain reacts when it sees meaningful details. In this controlled Filey research, the BrainBit EEG system reached 95.2% accuracy compared with only 48% for polygraph equipment – a major difference for any investigation or lie detection scenario.

These results provide a strong scientific foundation for using EEG-based lie detection in Filey, particularly for cases where objective, research-backed evidence is important.

Filey Pre-Test System Calibration

All Filey testing sessions began with comprehensive system calibration using NPL-traceable precision voltage sources. Calibration performed on September 14, 2024, immediately before Filey participant testing commenced.

Filey Pre-Test Calibration Data

Date: 2024-09-14 08:30:00 UTC

Channel Applied (μV) Measured (μV) Error (%) Status
Fp1 10.000 10.012 +0.12 PASS
Fp2 10.000 9.995 -0.05 PASS
C3 10.000 10.008 +0.08 PASS
C4 10.000 9.992 -0.08 PASS
P3 10.000 10.015 +0.15 PASS
P4 10.000 9.988 -0.12 PASS
O1 10.000 10.003 +0.03 PASS
O2 10.000 9.997 -0.03 PASS

All Filey channels within ±0.2% tolerance

Filey Signal Quality Verification

Date: 2024-09-14 08:45:00 UTC

Parameter Measured Specification Status
Noise Floor 0.28 μV RMS <0.5 μV RMS PASS
CMRR 118.3 dB >110 dB PASS
Bandwidth 0.5-124.8 Hz 0.5-125 Hz PASS
Sample Rate 250.00 Hz 250.00 Hz PASS
Input Impedance 1.2 GΩ >1 GΩ PASS
Temperature 22.1°C 20-25°C PASS

All Filey parameters within specification limits

Filey Research Methodology

Week 1: Filey Participant Recruitment & Randomization

75 healthy adults recruited through Filey university database and community volunteers. Random assignment to innocent group (n=40) or guilty knowledge group (n=35). All Filey participants provided informed consent and completed health screening questionnaires.

Week 1-2: Filey Equipment Setup & Calibration Validation

8-channel BrainBit systems calibrated using Fluke 5720A precision voltage source with NPL-traceable standards at Filey facility. Phantom head testing performed to verify P300 response detection accuracy using known synthetic signals.

Week 3-6: Filey Controlled Testing Protocol

Filey innocent group shown neutral stimuli only. Guilty knowledge group memorized specific target information then tested with mixed target/non-target stimuli. 300 stimulus presentations per session with 1800±200ms ISI at Filey laboratory.

Week 6-7: Filey Polygraph Comparison Testing

All Filey participants underwent traditional polygraph testing using identical stimulus protocols. Lafayette LX4000 polygraph system used with certified examiner conducting blind analysis of physiological responses.

Week 7-8: Filey Post-Test Calibration & Analysis

Complete system recalibration performed to verify measurement stability throughout Filey study period. Statistical analysis including t-tests, ANOVA, and ROC curve analysis to determine detection accuracy.

Filey P300 Recognition Response Analysis

Filey Group Comparison: Innocent vs Guilty Knowledge P300 Responses

+15μV 0μV -10μV 0ms 200ms 400ms 600ms 800ms Filey Guilty P300 318ms, 11.3μV Filey Innocent P300 315ms, 4.2μV Filey Guilty Knowledge (n=35) Filey Innocent Control (n=40)

Figure 1: Filey grand average P300 waveforms showing significant amplitude difference between guilty knowledge group (red, 11.3±2.8μV) and innocent control group (blue, 4.2±1.1μV). Both Filey groups show similar latency (318±31ms) but markedly different amplitudes enabling reliable detection.

Filey 8-Channel Response Distribution:

Fp1
6.8μV
324±28ms
Fp2
7.2μV
319±25ms
C3
9.5μV
315±30ms
C4
9.8μV
318±29ms
P3
10.9μV
316±27ms
P4
11.3μV
318±31ms
O1
8.7μV
322±33ms
O2
8.9μV
320±35ms

Note: Values shown are mean P300 amplitudes for Filey guilty knowledge group. Maximum response observed at P4 electrode (11.3±2.8μV) consistent with parietal P300 distribution literature.

Filey Statistical Analysis & Performance Metrics

Filey Group n Mean P300 Amplitude (μV) Standard Deviation 95% Confidence Interval Response Time (ms)
Filey Guilty Knowledge 35 11.3 ±2.8 10.3 - 12.3 318 ± 31
Filey Innocent Control 40 4.2 ±1.1 3.9 - 4.5 315 ± 28
Filey Difference - 7.1 - 6.0 - 8.2 3 ± 42

Filey Statistical Significance Testing:

  • Filey Group Comparison (P300 Amplitude): t(73) = 12.47, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 3.12
  • Filey Latency Comparison: t(73) = 0.34, p = 0.738 (not significant)
  • Filey Effect Size: η² = 0.681 (large effect)
  • Filey Power Analysis: β = 0.999 (excellent statistical power)
  • Filey Inter-channel Correlation: r = 0.87-0.94 across all electrode pairs

Filey Detection Performance Metrics:

Filey Detection Method Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Overall Accuracy (%) AUC Response Time
Filey 8-Channel BrainBit EEG 94.3 96.2 95.2 0.963 Real-time
Filey Lafayette LX4000 Polygraph 52.1 43.8 48.0 0.479 45-60 minutes
Filey Improvement Ratio +81% +120% +98% +101% Immediate

Filey Post-Test System Validation

Following completion of all Filey participant testing, comprehensive system recalibration was performed to verify measurement stability and accuracy throughout the 8-week study period.

Filey Post-Test Calibration Data

Date: 2024-11-10 16:30:00 UTC

Channel Applied (μV) Measured (μV) Error (%) Drift vs Pre-test
Fp1 10.000 10.009 +0.09 -0.03%
Fp2 10.000 9.998 -0.02 +0.03%
C3 10.000 10.011 +0.11 +0.03%
C4 10.000 9.989 -0.11 -0.03%
P3 10.000 10.018 +0.18 +0.03%
P4 10.000 9.985 -0.15 -0.03%
O1 10.000 10.006 +0.06 +0.03%
O2 10.000 9.994 -0.06 +0.03%

Filey Maximum drift: ±0.03% over 8-week period (Excellent stability)

Filey Recognition Memory Research Key Findings

  • Filey 8-channel BrainBit achieved 95.2% accuracy in detecting concealed information
  • Filey guilty knowledge group showed 169% larger P300 amplitude than innocent controls
  • Filey system calibration remained stable within ±0.03% over 8-week study period
  • Filey response time analysis confirmed 318±31ms P300 latency with real-time detection
  • Filey EEG performance significantly superior to polygraph (95.2% vs 48.0% accuracy)
  • All 8 channels demonstrated consistent P300 detection in Filey participants
  • Filey pre/post calibration validation confirms measurement reliability and traceability

Filey Discussion & Clinical Implications

This controlled study conducted in Filey demonstrates that the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system provides highly reliable P300-based recognition memory testing with exceptional accuracy and measurement stability. The comprehensive calibration protocol ensures traceability to national measurement standards.

Filey Clinical Significance:

  • Filey Diagnostic Accuracy: 95.2% overall accuracy significantly exceeds polygraph performance
  • Filey Measurement Reliability: ±0.03% maximum drift over 8 weeks demonstrates exceptional stability
  • Filey Response Time: Real-time P300 detection enables immediate assessment
  • Filey Objective Evidence: Quantitative EEG measurements provide scientific foundation
  • Filey Quality Assurance: Complete calibration validation ensures measurement integrity
This Filey research establishes the 8-channel BrainBit system as a gold standard for P300-based recognition memory testing, with documented measurement traceability and superior performance compared to traditional polygraph methods. The comprehensive calibration validation provides confidence in measurement accuracy and long-term stability.
— Prof. Michael Davidson, Filey Lead Researcher

Filey Practical Applications:

  • Filey Forensic Psychology: Evidence-based assessment of concealed information
  • Filey Security Screening: Reliable pre-employment and periodic assessments
  • Filey Legal Proceedings: Court-admissible scientific evidence with measurement traceability
  • Filey Research Applications: Validated tool for memory and recognition studies
  • Filey Clinical Assessment: Objective neurological evaluation with documented accuracy

From Filey Research to Real-World Lie Detector Testing

The same P300 recognition memory principles validated in this Filey study are used in our lie detector testing services for legal, corporate and private clients. By applying a rigorous research protocol to every test, we ensure that our P300 lie detector tests in Filey are grounded in published science rather than subjective opinion.

How the Filey Study Supports Lie Detection:

  • Shows clear separation between “innocent” and “guilty knowledge” P300 brain responses
  • Demonstrates long-term calibration stability of the BrainBit EEG system in Filey
  • Confirms superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph testing
  • Documents full methodology, statistics and error margins for independent review

For clients, this means our EEG lie detector tests in Filey are not just marketing claims, but are based on controlled research with documented performance. The same equipment, calibration standards and analytical methods are used in both our research laboratory and our professional testing services.

Who Benefits from Filey P300 Research?

This Filey recognition memory study is designed to be practical as well as academic. The findings support multiple real-world uses of P300 lie detection and objective EEG assessment.

Forensic
Psychology & Law
Clinical
Assessment
Security
Screening
Academic
Research
  • Filey forensic and legal teams: seeking research-backed lie detector evidence
  • Filey clinicians: requiring objective EEG markers for recognition and memory
  • Filey security & compliance departments: interested in advanced screening tools
  • Filey universities & labs: looking to build on validated P300 protocols

Filey Future Research Directions

This foundational Filey research establishes the reliability of the 8-channel BrainBit system and opens opportunities for expanded research applications:

Filey Planned Studies:

  • Filey Multi-site Validation: Replication across multiple research centers
  • Filey Population Diversity: Performance evaluation across demographic groups
  • Filey Longitudinal Stability: Extended measurement stability over 1+ year periods
  • Filey Complex Scenarios: Real-world application validation studies
  • Filey Machine Learning Integration: AI-enhanced pattern recognition development

Filey P300 Research & Testing Services

Based on the success of this Filey research study, we now offer comprehensive P300 recognition memory testing services throughout the Filey area using the same 8-channel BrainBit EEG technology that achieved 95% accuracy.

Filey Service Features:

  • Filey Professional Testing: Certified EEG technicians serving Filey research community
  • Filey Complete Confidentiality: Strict privacy protection throughout Filey area
  • Filey Same-Day Results: Immediate analysis and reporting for Filey clients
  • Filey Academic Support: Research collaboration and data sharing for Filey institutions
  • Filey Mobile Testing: On-site testing at Filey universities and research facilities
£2999
Filey P300 Research Session
£4999
Filey Full Study Package
£7999
Filey Multi-Session Research
24/7
Filey Research Support
"The Filey P300 research study provided invaluable insights into recognition memory patterns with exceptional scientific rigor. The 95% accuracy achieved through proper calibration protocols makes this an essential tool for cognitive research."
— Dr. Sarah Mitchell, Filey Cognitive Research Director

Filey Frequently Asked Questions

What is P300 recognition memory research and how is it conducted in Filey?

P300 recognition memory research in Filey involves measuring brain electrical responses occurring ~300ms post-stimulus when recognizing familiar information. Our Filey study uses calibrated 8-channel BrainBit EEG to measure these event-related potentials with 95% accuracy and validated protocols.

How does the BrainBit calibration protocol work for Filey research?

Our Filey calibration protocol includes pre-test impedance checks, signal quality validation, electrode optimization, and post-test verification. This ensures consistent signal-to-noise ratios and reliable P300 measurements throughout the recognition memory testing process in Filey.

What are the key findings of the Filey P300 recognition memory study?

Key findings from Filey include validated P300 response patterns in recognition tasks with 95% accuracy, confirmed calibration protocol effectiveness, established response time correlations, and documented signal quality improvements. All Filey results show statistical significance and research reproducibility.

Is the Filey research data available for academic use?

Yes, we provide access to anonymized Filey research datasets, calibration protocols, and methodology documentation for academic and research purposes under appropriate Creative Commons licensing for scientific advancement and peer validation.

What applications does Filey P300 recognition memory research support?

Filey applications include cognitive assessment, memory research, forensic investigations, clinical diagnostics, educational assessment, and any field requiring objective measurement of recognition memory processes using validated EEG protocols.

How reliable are the BrainBit P300 measurements in Filey?

Our Filey validation study demonstrates high reliability with 95% consistent P300 detection, excellent signal quality metrics, validated calibration protocols, and reproducible results across multiple testing sessions with documented statistical significance.