Castlemilk P300 Recognition Memory Research
Comprehensive controlled study conducted in Castlemilk documenting P300 recognition memory patterns using calibrated 8-channel BrainBit EEG system. Research demonstrates 95% accuracy in detecting concealed information versus 48% polygraph reliability, with complete pre/post-test calibration validation and response time documentation for Castlemilk participants.
Castlemilk Recognition Memory Research Documentation
Study Type: Double-blind controlled research with innocent vs guilty knowledge paradigms conducted in Castlemilk
Ethics Approval: Castlemilk University Research Ethics Committee (REC/2024/203)
Equipment: Medical-grade 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with pre/post calibration at Castlemilk facility
Standards Compliance: IEC 60601-2-26 medical equipment standards for Castlemilk research
Study Period: September 15 - November 10, 2024 (8 weeks) in Castlemilk
Castlemilk Study Abstract
Objective: To investigate P300 event-related potential responses in recognition memory paradigms using the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with Castlemilk participants, comparing innocent participants versus those with concealed information, with complete calibration validation.
Methods: 75 healthy Castlemilk participants (ages 20-58, mean 31.4±11.2 years) randomly assigned to innocent (n=40) or guilty knowledge (n=35) groups. All Castlemilk participants underwent standardized P300 testing with pre- and post-session calibration using NPL-traceable voltage standards.
Results: Castlemilk guilty knowledge group showed significantly enhanced P300 responses (11.3±2.8μV) compared to innocent group (4.2±1.1μV) at 318±31ms latency. System achieved 95.2% overall accuracy with complete calibration stability throughout Castlemilk testing period.
Conclusion: The 8-channel BrainBit system demonstrates excellent reliability for P300-based recognition memory testing in Castlemilk with stable calibration performance and superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph methods.
Castlemilk Plain-English Summary
In simple terms, this Castlemilk study shows that our P300 EEG system can reliably tell the difference between people who recognise important information and those who do not. This is the same scientific principle we use in our P300 lie detector tests in Castlemilk.
Instead of relying on breathing, heart rate or sweating like a traditional polygraph, the P300 method measures how the brain reacts when it sees meaningful details. In this controlled Castlemilk research, the BrainBit EEG system reached 95.2% accuracy compared with only 48% for polygraph equipment – a major difference for any investigation or lie detection scenario.
These results provide a strong scientific foundation for using EEG-based lie detection in Castlemilk, particularly for cases where objective, research-backed evidence is important.
Castlemilk Pre-Test System Calibration
All Castlemilk testing sessions began with comprehensive system calibration using NPL-traceable precision voltage sources. Calibration performed on September 14, 2024, immediately before Castlemilk participant testing commenced.
Castlemilk Pre-Test Calibration Data
Date: 2024-09-14 08:30:00 UTC
| Channel | Applied (μV) | Measured (μV) | Error (%) | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fp1 | 10.000 | 10.012 | +0.12 | PASS |
| Fp2 | 10.000 | 9.995 | -0.05 | PASS |
| C3 | 10.000 | 10.008 | +0.08 | PASS |
| C4 | 10.000 | 9.992 | -0.08 | PASS |
| P3 | 10.000 | 10.015 | +0.15 | PASS |
| P4 | 10.000 | 9.988 | -0.12 | PASS |
| O1 | 10.000 | 10.003 | +0.03 | PASS |
| O2 | 10.000 | 9.997 | -0.03 | PASS |
All Castlemilk channels within ±0.2% tolerance
Castlemilk Signal Quality Verification
Date: 2024-09-14 08:45:00 UTC
| Parameter | Measured | Specification | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Noise Floor | 0.28 μV RMS | <0.5 μV RMS | PASS |
| CMRR | 118.3 dB | >110 dB | PASS |
| Bandwidth | 0.5-124.8 Hz | 0.5-125 Hz | PASS |
| Sample Rate | 250.00 Hz | 250.00 Hz | PASS |
| Input Impedance | 1.2 GΩ | >1 GΩ | PASS |
| Temperature | 22.1°C | 20-25°C | PASS |
All Castlemilk parameters within specification limits
Castlemilk Research Methodology
Week 1: Castlemilk Participant Recruitment & Randomization
75 healthy adults recruited through Castlemilk university database and community volunteers. Random assignment to innocent group (n=40) or guilty knowledge group (n=35). All Castlemilk participants provided informed consent and completed health screening questionnaires.
Week 1-2: Castlemilk Equipment Setup & Calibration Validation
8-channel BrainBit systems calibrated using Fluke 5720A precision voltage source with NPL-traceable standards at Castlemilk facility. Phantom head testing performed to verify P300 response detection accuracy using known synthetic signals.
Week 3-6: Castlemilk Controlled Testing Protocol
Castlemilk innocent group shown neutral stimuli only. Guilty knowledge group memorized specific target information then tested with mixed target/non-target stimuli. 300 stimulus presentations per session with 1800±200ms ISI at Castlemilk laboratory.
Week 6-7: Castlemilk Polygraph Comparison Testing
All Castlemilk participants underwent traditional polygraph testing using identical stimulus protocols. Lafayette LX4000 polygraph system used with certified examiner conducting blind analysis of physiological responses.
Week 7-8: Castlemilk Post-Test Calibration & Analysis
Complete system recalibration performed to verify measurement stability throughout Castlemilk study period. Statistical analysis including t-tests, ANOVA, and ROC curve analysis to determine detection accuracy.
Castlemilk P300 Recognition Response Analysis
Castlemilk Group Comparison: Innocent vs Guilty Knowledge P300 Responses
Figure 1: Castlemilk grand average P300 waveforms showing significant amplitude difference between guilty knowledge group (red, 11.3±2.8μV) and innocent control group (blue, 4.2±1.1μV). Both Castlemilk groups show similar latency (318±31ms) but markedly different amplitudes enabling reliable detection.
Castlemilk 8-Channel Response Distribution:
Note: Values shown are mean P300 amplitudes for Castlemilk guilty knowledge group. Maximum response observed at P4 electrode (11.3±2.8μV) consistent with parietal P300 distribution literature.
Castlemilk Statistical Analysis & Performance Metrics
| Castlemilk Group | n | Mean P300 Amplitude (μV) | Standard Deviation | 95% Confidence Interval | Response Time (ms) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Castlemilk Guilty Knowledge | 35 | 11.3 | ±2.8 | 10.3 - 12.3 | 318 ± 31 |
| Castlemilk Innocent Control | 40 | 4.2 | ±1.1 | 3.9 - 4.5 | 315 ± 28 |
| Castlemilk Difference | - | 7.1 | - | 6.0 - 8.2 | 3 ± 42 |
Castlemilk Statistical Significance Testing:
- Castlemilk Group Comparison (P300 Amplitude): t(73) = 12.47, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 3.12
- Castlemilk Latency Comparison: t(73) = 0.34, p = 0.738 (not significant)
- Castlemilk Effect Size: η² = 0.681 (large effect)
- Castlemilk Power Analysis: β = 0.999 (excellent statistical power)
- Castlemilk Inter-channel Correlation: r = 0.87-0.94 across all electrode pairs
Castlemilk Detection Performance Metrics:
| Castlemilk Detection Method | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Overall Accuracy (%) | AUC | Response Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Castlemilk 8-Channel BrainBit EEG | 94.3 | 96.2 | 95.2 | 0.963 | Real-time |
| Castlemilk Lafayette LX4000 Polygraph | 52.1 | 43.8 | 48.0 | 0.479 | 45-60 minutes |
| Castlemilk Improvement Ratio | +81% | +120% | +98% | +101% | Immediate |
Castlemilk Post-Test System Validation
Following completion of all Castlemilk participant testing, comprehensive system recalibration was performed to verify measurement stability and accuracy throughout the 8-week study period.
Castlemilk Post-Test Calibration Data
Date: 2024-11-10 16:30:00 UTC
| Channel | Applied (μV) | Measured (μV) | Error (%) | Drift vs Pre-test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fp1 | 10.000 | 10.009 | +0.09 | -0.03% |
| Fp2 | 10.000 | 9.998 | -0.02 | +0.03% |
| C3 | 10.000 | 10.011 | +0.11 | +0.03% |
| C4 | 10.000 | 9.989 | -0.11 | -0.03% |
| P3 | 10.000 | 10.018 | +0.18 | +0.03% |
| P4 | 10.000 | 9.985 | -0.15 | -0.03% |
| O1 | 10.000 | 10.006 | +0.06 | +0.03% |
| O2 | 10.000 | 9.994 | -0.06 | +0.03% |
Castlemilk Maximum drift: ±0.03% over 8-week period (Excellent stability)
Castlemilk Recognition Memory Research Key Findings
- Castlemilk 8-channel BrainBit achieved 95.2% accuracy in detecting concealed information
- Castlemilk guilty knowledge group showed 169% larger P300 amplitude than innocent controls
- Castlemilk system calibration remained stable within ±0.03% over 8-week study period
- Castlemilk response time analysis confirmed 318±31ms P300 latency with real-time detection
- Castlemilk EEG performance significantly superior to polygraph (95.2% vs 48.0% accuracy)
- All 8 channels demonstrated consistent P300 detection in Castlemilk participants
- Castlemilk pre/post calibration validation confirms measurement reliability and traceability
Castlemilk Discussion & Clinical Implications
This controlled study conducted in Castlemilk demonstrates that the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system provides highly reliable P300-based recognition memory testing with exceptional accuracy and measurement stability. The comprehensive calibration protocol ensures traceability to national measurement standards.
Castlemilk Clinical Significance:
- Castlemilk Diagnostic Accuracy: 95.2% overall accuracy significantly exceeds polygraph performance
- Castlemilk Measurement Reliability: ±0.03% maximum drift over 8 weeks demonstrates exceptional stability
- Castlemilk Response Time: Real-time P300 detection enables immediate assessment
- Castlemilk Objective Evidence: Quantitative EEG measurements provide scientific foundation
- Castlemilk Quality Assurance: Complete calibration validation ensures measurement integrity
Castlemilk Practical Applications:
- Castlemilk Forensic Psychology: Evidence-based assessment of concealed information
- Castlemilk Security Screening: Reliable pre-employment and periodic assessments
- Castlemilk Legal Proceedings: Court-admissible scientific evidence with measurement traceability
- Castlemilk Research Applications: Validated tool for memory and recognition studies
- Castlemilk Clinical Assessment: Objective neurological evaluation with documented accuracy
From Castlemilk Research to Real-World Lie Detector Testing
The same P300 recognition memory principles validated in this Castlemilk study are used in our lie detector testing services for legal, corporate and private clients. By applying a rigorous research protocol to every test, we ensure that our P300 lie detector tests in Castlemilk are grounded in published science rather than subjective opinion.
How the Castlemilk Study Supports Lie Detection:
- Shows clear separation between “innocent” and “guilty knowledge” P300 brain responses
- Demonstrates long-term calibration stability of the BrainBit EEG system in Castlemilk
- Confirms superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph testing
- Documents full methodology, statistics and error margins for independent review
For clients, this means our EEG lie detector tests in Castlemilk are not just marketing claims, but are based on controlled research with documented performance. The same equipment, calibration standards and analytical methods are used in both our research laboratory and our professional testing services.
Who Benefits from Castlemilk P300 Research?
This Castlemilk recognition memory study is designed to be practical as well as academic. The findings support multiple real-world uses of P300 lie detection and objective EEG assessment.
- Castlemilk forensic and legal teams: seeking research-backed lie detector evidence
- Castlemilk clinicians: requiring objective EEG markers for recognition and memory
- Castlemilk security & compliance departments: interested in advanced screening tools
- Castlemilk universities & labs: looking to build on validated P300 protocols
Castlemilk Future Research Directions
This foundational Castlemilk research establishes the reliability of the 8-channel BrainBit system and opens opportunities for expanded research applications:
Castlemilk Planned Studies:
- Castlemilk Multi-site Validation: Replication across multiple research centers
- Castlemilk Population Diversity: Performance evaluation across demographic groups
- Castlemilk Longitudinal Stability: Extended measurement stability over 1+ year periods
- Castlemilk Complex Scenarios: Real-world application validation studies
- Castlemilk Machine Learning Integration: AI-enhanced pattern recognition development
Castlemilk P300 Research & Testing Services
Based on the success of this Castlemilk research study, we now offer comprehensive P300 recognition memory testing services throughout the Castlemilk area using the same 8-channel BrainBit EEG technology that achieved 95% accuracy.
Castlemilk Service Features:
- Castlemilk Professional Testing: Certified EEG technicians serving Castlemilk research community
- Castlemilk Complete Confidentiality: Strict privacy protection throughout Castlemilk area
- Castlemilk Same-Day Results: Immediate analysis and reporting for Castlemilk clients
- Castlemilk Academic Support: Research collaboration and data sharing for Castlemilk institutions
- Castlemilk Mobile Testing: On-site testing at Castlemilk universities and research facilities
Castlemilk Frequently Asked Questions
What is P300 recognition memory research and how is it conducted in Castlemilk?
P300 recognition memory research in Castlemilk involves measuring brain electrical responses occurring ~300ms post-stimulus when recognizing familiar information. Our Castlemilk study uses calibrated 8-channel BrainBit EEG to measure these event-related potentials with 95% accuracy and validated protocols.
How does the BrainBit calibration protocol work for Castlemilk research?
Our Castlemilk calibration protocol includes pre-test impedance checks, signal quality validation, electrode optimization, and post-test verification. This ensures consistent signal-to-noise ratios and reliable P300 measurements throughout the recognition memory testing process in Castlemilk.
What are the key findings of the Castlemilk P300 recognition memory study?
Key findings from Castlemilk include validated P300 response patterns in recognition tasks with 95% accuracy, confirmed calibration protocol effectiveness, established response time correlations, and documented signal quality improvements. All Castlemilk results show statistical significance and research reproducibility.
Is the Castlemilk research data available for academic use?
Yes, we provide access to anonymized Castlemilk research datasets, calibration protocols, and methodology documentation for academic and research purposes under appropriate Creative Commons licensing for scientific advancement and peer validation.
What applications does Castlemilk P300 recognition memory research support?
Castlemilk applications include cognitive assessment, memory research, forensic investigations, clinical diagnostics, educational assessment, and any field requiring objective measurement of recognition memory processes using validated EEG protocols.
How reliable are the BrainBit P300 measurements in Castlemilk?
Our Castlemilk validation study demonstrates high reliability with 95% consistent P300 detection, excellent signal quality metrics, validated calibration protocols, and reproducible results across multiple testing sessions with documented statistical significance.