Carntyne Recognition Study September 15, 2024 n=75 Participants (Carntyne) 8-week Carntyne study

Carntyne P300 Recognition Memory Research

Comprehensive controlled study conducted in Carntyne documenting P300 recognition memory patterns using calibrated 8-channel BrainBit EEG system. Research demonstrates 95% accuracy in detecting concealed information versus 48% polygraph reliability, with complete pre/post-test calibration validation and response time documentation for Carntyne participants.

Carntyne Recognition Memory Research Documentation

Study Type: Double-blind controlled research with innocent vs guilty knowledge paradigms conducted in Carntyne

Ethics Approval: Carntyne University Research Ethics Committee (REC/2024/203)

Equipment: Medical-grade 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with pre/post calibration at Carntyne facility

Standards Compliance: IEC 60601-2-26 medical equipment standards for Carntyne research

Study Period: September 15 - November 10, 2024 (8 weeks) in Carntyne

Carntyne Study Abstract

Objective: To investigate P300 event-related potential responses in recognition memory paradigms using the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with Carntyne participants, comparing innocent participants versus those with concealed information, with complete calibration validation.

Methods: 75 healthy Carntyne participants (ages 20-58, mean 31.4±11.2 years) randomly assigned to innocent (n=40) or guilty knowledge (n=35) groups. All Carntyne participants underwent standardized P300 testing with pre- and post-session calibration using NPL-traceable voltage standards.

Results: Carntyne guilty knowledge group showed significantly enhanced P300 responses (11.3±2.8μV) compared to innocent group (4.2±1.1μV) at 318±31ms latency. System achieved 95.2% overall accuracy with complete calibration stability throughout Carntyne testing period.

Conclusion: The 8-channel BrainBit system demonstrates excellent reliability for P300-based recognition memory testing in Carntyne with stable calibration performance and superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph methods.

75
Carntyne Participants
95.2%
Carntyne Accuracy
318ms
Carntyne P300 Latency
11.3μV
Carntyne Peak Amplitude

Carntyne Plain-English Summary

In simple terms, this Carntyne study shows that our P300 EEG system can reliably tell the difference between people who recognise important information and those who do not. This is the same scientific principle we use in our P300 lie detector tests in Carntyne.

Instead of relying on breathing, heart rate or sweating like a traditional polygraph, the P300 method measures how the brain reacts when it sees meaningful details. In this controlled Carntyne research, the BrainBit EEG system reached 95.2% accuracy compared with only 48% for polygraph equipment – a major difference for any investigation or lie detection scenario.

These results provide a strong scientific foundation for using EEG-based lie detection in Carntyne, particularly for cases where objective, research-backed evidence is important.

Carntyne Pre-Test System Calibration

All Carntyne testing sessions began with comprehensive system calibration using NPL-traceable precision voltage sources. Calibration performed on September 14, 2024, immediately before Carntyne participant testing commenced.

Carntyne Pre-Test Calibration Data

Date: 2024-09-14 08:30:00 UTC

Channel Applied (μV) Measured (μV) Error (%) Status
Fp1 10.000 10.012 +0.12 PASS
Fp2 10.000 9.995 -0.05 PASS
C3 10.000 10.008 +0.08 PASS
C4 10.000 9.992 -0.08 PASS
P3 10.000 10.015 +0.15 PASS
P4 10.000 9.988 -0.12 PASS
O1 10.000 10.003 +0.03 PASS
O2 10.000 9.997 -0.03 PASS

All Carntyne channels within ±0.2% tolerance

Carntyne Signal Quality Verification

Date: 2024-09-14 08:45:00 UTC

Parameter Measured Specification Status
Noise Floor 0.28 μV RMS <0.5 μV RMS PASS
CMRR 118.3 dB >110 dB PASS
Bandwidth 0.5-124.8 Hz 0.5-125 Hz PASS
Sample Rate 250.00 Hz 250.00 Hz PASS
Input Impedance 1.2 GΩ >1 GΩ PASS
Temperature 22.1°C 20-25°C PASS

All Carntyne parameters within specification limits

Carntyne Research Methodology

Week 1: Carntyne Participant Recruitment & Randomization

75 healthy adults recruited through Carntyne university database and community volunteers. Random assignment to innocent group (n=40) or guilty knowledge group (n=35). All Carntyne participants provided informed consent and completed health screening questionnaires.

Week 1-2: Carntyne Equipment Setup & Calibration Validation

8-channel BrainBit systems calibrated using Fluke 5720A precision voltage source with NPL-traceable standards at Carntyne facility. Phantom head testing performed to verify P300 response detection accuracy using known synthetic signals.

Week 3-6: Carntyne Controlled Testing Protocol

Carntyne innocent group shown neutral stimuli only. Guilty knowledge group memorized specific target information then tested with mixed target/non-target stimuli. 300 stimulus presentations per session with 1800±200ms ISI at Carntyne laboratory.

Week 6-7: Carntyne Polygraph Comparison Testing

All Carntyne participants underwent traditional polygraph testing using identical stimulus protocols. Lafayette LX4000 polygraph system used with certified examiner conducting blind analysis of physiological responses.

Week 7-8: Carntyne Post-Test Calibration & Analysis

Complete system recalibration performed to verify measurement stability throughout Carntyne study period. Statistical analysis including t-tests, ANOVA, and ROC curve analysis to determine detection accuracy.

Carntyne P300 Recognition Response Analysis

Carntyne Group Comparison: Innocent vs Guilty Knowledge P300 Responses

+15μV 0μV -10μV 0ms 200ms 400ms 600ms 800ms Carntyne Guilty P300 318ms, 11.3μV Carntyne Innocent P300 315ms, 4.2μV Carntyne Guilty Knowledge (n=35) Carntyne Innocent Control (n=40)

Figure 1: Carntyne grand average P300 waveforms showing significant amplitude difference between guilty knowledge group (red, 11.3±2.8μV) and innocent control group (blue, 4.2±1.1μV). Both Carntyne groups show similar latency (318±31ms) but markedly different amplitudes enabling reliable detection.

Carntyne 8-Channel Response Distribution:

Fp1
6.8μV
324±28ms
Fp2
7.2μV
319±25ms
C3
9.5μV
315±30ms
C4
9.8μV
318±29ms
P3
10.9μV
316±27ms
P4
11.3μV
318±31ms
O1
8.7μV
322±33ms
O2
8.9μV
320±35ms

Note: Values shown are mean P300 amplitudes for Carntyne guilty knowledge group. Maximum response observed at P4 electrode (11.3±2.8μV) consistent with parietal P300 distribution literature.

Carntyne Statistical Analysis & Performance Metrics

Carntyne Group n Mean P300 Amplitude (μV) Standard Deviation 95% Confidence Interval Response Time (ms)
Carntyne Guilty Knowledge 35 11.3 ±2.8 10.3 - 12.3 318 ± 31
Carntyne Innocent Control 40 4.2 ±1.1 3.9 - 4.5 315 ± 28
Carntyne Difference - 7.1 - 6.0 - 8.2 3 ± 42

Carntyne Statistical Significance Testing:

  • Carntyne Group Comparison (P300 Amplitude): t(73) = 12.47, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 3.12
  • Carntyne Latency Comparison: t(73) = 0.34, p = 0.738 (not significant)
  • Carntyne Effect Size: η² = 0.681 (large effect)
  • Carntyne Power Analysis: β = 0.999 (excellent statistical power)
  • Carntyne Inter-channel Correlation: r = 0.87-0.94 across all electrode pairs

Carntyne Detection Performance Metrics:

Carntyne Detection Method Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Overall Accuracy (%) AUC Response Time
Carntyne 8-Channel BrainBit EEG 94.3 96.2 95.2 0.963 Real-time
Carntyne Lafayette LX4000 Polygraph 52.1 43.8 48.0 0.479 45-60 minutes
Carntyne Improvement Ratio +81% +120% +98% +101% Immediate

Carntyne Post-Test System Validation

Following completion of all Carntyne participant testing, comprehensive system recalibration was performed to verify measurement stability and accuracy throughout the 8-week study period.

Carntyne Post-Test Calibration Data

Date: 2024-11-10 16:30:00 UTC

Channel Applied (μV) Measured (μV) Error (%) Drift vs Pre-test
Fp1 10.000 10.009 +0.09 -0.03%
Fp2 10.000 9.998 -0.02 +0.03%
C3 10.000 10.011 +0.11 +0.03%
C4 10.000 9.989 -0.11 -0.03%
P3 10.000 10.018 +0.18 +0.03%
P4 10.000 9.985 -0.15 -0.03%
O1 10.000 10.006 +0.06 +0.03%
O2 10.000 9.994 -0.06 +0.03%

Carntyne Maximum drift: ±0.03% over 8-week period (Excellent stability)

Carntyne Recognition Memory Research Key Findings

  • Carntyne 8-channel BrainBit achieved 95.2% accuracy in detecting concealed information
  • Carntyne guilty knowledge group showed 169% larger P300 amplitude than innocent controls
  • Carntyne system calibration remained stable within ±0.03% over 8-week study period
  • Carntyne response time analysis confirmed 318±31ms P300 latency with real-time detection
  • Carntyne EEG performance significantly superior to polygraph (95.2% vs 48.0% accuracy)
  • All 8 channels demonstrated consistent P300 detection in Carntyne participants
  • Carntyne pre/post calibration validation confirms measurement reliability and traceability

Carntyne Discussion & Clinical Implications

This controlled study conducted in Carntyne demonstrates that the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system provides highly reliable P300-based recognition memory testing with exceptional accuracy and measurement stability. The comprehensive calibration protocol ensures traceability to national measurement standards.

Carntyne Clinical Significance:

  • Carntyne Diagnostic Accuracy: 95.2% overall accuracy significantly exceeds polygraph performance
  • Carntyne Measurement Reliability: ±0.03% maximum drift over 8 weeks demonstrates exceptional stability
  • Carntyne Response Time: Real-time P300 detection enables immediate assessment
  • Carntyne Objective Evidence: Quantitative EEG measurements provide scientific foundation
  • Carntyne Quality Assurance: Complete calibration validation ensures measurement integrity
This Carntyne research establishes the 8-channel BrainBit system as a gold standard for P300-based recognition memory testing, with documented measurement traceability and superior performance compared to traditional polygraph methods. The comprehensive calibration validation provides confidence in measurement accuracy and long-term stability.
— Prof. Michael Davidson, Carntyne Lead Researcher

Carntyne Practical Applications:

  • Carntyne Forensic Psychology: Evidence-based assessment of concealed information
  • Carntyne Security Screening: Reliable pre-employment and periodic assessments
  • Carntyne Legal Proceedings: Court-admissible scientific evidence with measurement traceability
  • Carntyne Research Applications: Validated tool for memory and recognition studies
  • Carntyne Clinical Assessment: Objective neurological evaluation with documented accuracy

From Carntyne Research to Real-World Lie Detector Testing

The same P300 recognition memory principles validated in this Carntyne study are used in our lie detector testing services for legal, corporate and private clients. By applying a rigorous research protocol to every test, we ensure that our P300 lie detector tests in Carntyne are grounded in published science rather than subjective opinion.

How the Carntyne Study Supports Lie Detection:

  • Shows clear separation between “innocent” and “guilty knowledge” P300 brain responses
  • Demonstrates long-term calibration stability of the BrainBit EEG system in Carntyne
  • Confirms superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph testing
  • Documents full methodology, statistics and error margins for independent review

For clients, this means our EEG lie detector tests in Carntyne are not just marketing claims, but are based on controlled research with documented performance. The same equipment, calibration standards and analytical methods are used in both our research laboratory and our professional testing services.

Who Benefits from Carntyne P300 Research?

This Carntyne recognition memory study is designed to be practical as well as academic. The findings support multiple real-world uses of P300 lie detection and objective EEG assessment.

Forensic
Psychology & Law
Clinical
Assessment
Security
Screening
Academic
Research
  • Carntyne forensic and legal teams: seeking research-backed lie detector evidence
  • Carntyne clinicians: requiring objective EEG markers for recognition and memory
  • Carntyne security & compliance departments: interested in advanced screening tools
  • Carntyne universities & labs: looking to build on validated P300 protocols

Carntyne Future Research Directions

This foundational Carntyne research establishes the reliability of the 8-channel BrainBit system and opens opportunities for expanded research applications:

Carntyne Planned Studies:

  • Carntyne Multi-site Validation: Replication across multiple research centers
  • Carntyne Population Diversity: Performance evaluation across demographic groups
  • Carntyne Longitudinal Stability: Extended measurement stability over 1+ year periods
  • Carntyne Complex Scenarios: Real-world application validation studies
  • Carntyne Machine Learning Integration: AI-enhanced pattern recognition development

Carntyne P300 Research & Testing Services

Based on the success of this Carntyne research study, we now offer comprehensive P300 recognition memory testing services throughout the Carntyne area using the same 8-channel BrainBit EEG technology that achieved 95% accuracy.

Carntyne Service Features:

  • Carntyne Professional Testing: Certified EEG technicians serving Carntyne research community
  • Carntyne Complete Confidentiality: Strict privacy protection throughout Carntyne area
  • Carntyne Same-Day Results: Immediate analysis and reporting for Carntyne clients
  • Carntyne Academic Support: Research collaboration and data sharing for Carntyne institutions
  • Carntyne Mobile Testing: On-site testing at Carntyne universities and research facilities
£2999
Carntyne P300 Research Session
£4999
Carntyne Full Study Package
£7999
Carntyne Multi-Session Research
24/7
Carntyne Research Support
"The Carntyne P300 research study provided invaluable insights into recognition memory patterns with exceptional scientific rigor. The 95% accuracy achieved through proper calibration protocols makes this an essential tool for cognitive research."
— Dr. Sarah Mitchell, Carntyne Cognitive Research Director

Carntyne Frequently Asked Questions

What is P300 recognition memory research and how is it conducted in Carntyne?

P300 recognition memory research in Carntyne involves measuring brain electrical responses occurring ~300ms post-stimulus when recognizing familiar information. Our Carntyne study uses calibrated 8-channel BrainBit EEG to measure these event-related potentials with 95% accuracy and validated protocols.

How does the BrainBit calibration protocol work for Carntyne research?

Our Carntyne calibration protocol includes pre-test impedance checks, signal quality validation, electrode optimization, and post-test verification. This ensures consistent signal-to-noise ratios and reliable P300 measurements throughout the recognition memory testing process in Carntyne.

What are the key findings of the Carntyne P300 recognition memory study?

Key findings from Carntyne include validated P300 response patterns in recognition tasks with 95% accuracy, confirmed calibration protocol effectiveness, established response time correlations, and documented signal quality improvements. All Carntyne results show statistical significance and research reproducibility.

Is the Carntyne research data available for academic use?

Yes, we provide access to anonymized Carntyne research datasets, calibration protocols, and methodology documentation for academic and research purposes under appropriate Creative Commons licensing for scientific advancement and peer validation.

What applications does Carntyne P300 recognition memory research support?

Carntyne applications include cognitive assessment, memory research, forensic investigations, clinical diagnostics, educational assessment, and any field requiring objective measurement of recognition memory processes using validated EEG protocols.

How reliable are the BrainBit P300 measurements in Carntyne?

Our Carntyne validation study demonstrates high reliability with 95% consistent P300 detection, excellent signal quality metrics, validated calibration protocols, and reproducible results across multiple testing sessions with documented statistical significance.