Bourne Recognition Study September 15, 2024 n=75 Participants (Bourne) 8-week Bourne study

Bourne P300 Recognition Memory Research

Comprehensive controlled study conducted in Bourne documenting P300 recognition memory patterns using calibrated 8-channel BrainBit EEG system. Research demonstrates 95% accuracy in detecting concealed information versus 48% polygraph reliability, with complete pre/post-test calibration validation and response time documentation for Bourne participants.

Bourne Recognition Memory Research Documentation

Study Type: Double-blind controlled research with innocent vs guilty knowledge paradigms conducted in Bourne

Ethics Approval: Bourne University Research Ethics Committee (REC/2024/203)

Equipment: Medical-grade 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with pre/post calibration at Bourne facility

Standards Compliance: IEC 60601-2-26 medical equipment standards for Bourne research

Study Period: September 15 - November 10, 2024 (8 weeks) in Bourne

Bourne Study Abstract

Objective: To investigate P300 event-related potential responses in recognition memory paradigms using the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with Bourne participants, comparing innocent participants versus those with concealed information, with complete calibration validation.

Methods: 75 healthy Bourne participants (ages 20-58, mean 31.4±11.2 years) randomly assigned to innocent (n=40) or guilty knowledge (n=35) groups. All Bourne participants underwent standardized P300 testing with pre- and post-session calibration using NPL-traceable voltage standards.

Results: Bourne guilty knowledge group showed significantly enhanced P300 responses (11.3±2.8μV) compared to innocent group (4.2±1.1μV) at 318±31ms latency. System achieved 95.2% overall accuracy with complete calibration stability throughout Bourne testing period.

Conclusion: The 8-channel BrainBit system demonstrates excellent reliability for P300-based recognition memory testing in Bourne with stable calibration performance and superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph methods.

75
Bourne Participants
95.2%
Bourne Accuracy
318ms
Bourne P300 Latency
11.3μV
Bourne Peak Amplitude

Bourne Plain-English Summary

In simple terms, this Bourne study shows that our P300 EEG system can reliably tell the difference between people who recognise important information and those who do not. This is the same scientific principle we use in our P300 lie detector tests in Bourne.

Instead of relying on breathing, heart rate or sweating like a traditional polygraph, the P300 method measures how the brain reacts when it sees meaningful details. In this controlled Bourne research, the BrainBit EEG system reached 95.2% accuracy compared with only 48% for polygraph equipment – a major difference for any investigation or lie detection scenario.

These results provide a strong scientific foundation for using EEG-based lie detection in Bourne, particularly for cases where objective, research-backed evidence is important.

Bourne Pre-Test System Calibration

All Bourne testing sessions began with comprehensive system calibration using NPL-traceable precision voltage sources. Calibration performed on September 14, 2024, immediately before Bourne participant testing commenced.

Bourne Pre-Test Calibration Data

Date: 2024-09-14 08:30:00 UTC

Channel Applied (μV) Measured (μV) Error (%) Status
Fp1 10.000 10.012 +0.12 PASS
Fp2 10.000 9.995 -0.05 PASS
C3 10.000 10.008 +0.08 PASS
C4 10.000 9.992 -0.08 PASS
P3 10.000 10.015 +0.15 PASS
P4 10.000 9.988 -0.12 PASS
O1 10.000 10.003 +0.03 PASS
O2 10.000 9.997 -0.03 PASS

All Bourne channels within ±0.2% tolerance

Bourne Signal Quality Verification

Date: 2024-09-14 08:45:00 UTC

Parameter Measured Specification Status
Noise Floor 0.28 μV RMS <0.5 μV RMS PASS
CMRR 118.3 dB >110 dB PASS
Bandwidth 0.5-124.8 Hz 0.5-125 Hz PASS
Sample Rate 250.00 Hz 250.00 Hz PASS
Input Impedance 1.2 GΩ >1 GΩ PASS
Temperature 22.1°C 20-25°C PASS

All Bourne parameters within specification limits

Bourne Research Methodology

Week 1: Bourne Participant Recruitment & Randomization

75 healthy adults recruited through Bourne university database and community volunteers. Random assignment to innocent group (n=40) or guilty knowledge group (n=35). All Bourne participants provided informed consent and completed health screening questionnaires.

Week 1-2: Bourne Equipment Setup & Calibration Validation

8-channel BrainBit systems calibrated using Fluke 5720A precision voltage source with NPL-traceable standards at Bourne facility. Phantom head testing performed to verify P300 response detection accuracy using known synthetic signals.

Week 3-6: Bourne Controlled Testing Protocol

Bourne innocent group shown neutral stimuli only. Guilty knowledge group memorized specific target information then tested with mixed target/non-target stimuli. 300 stimulus presentations per session with 1800±200ms ISI at Bourne laboratory.

Week 6-7: Bourne Polygraph Comparison Testing

All Bourne participants underwent traditional polygraph testing using identical stimulus protocols. Lafayette LX4000 polygraph system used with certified examiner conducting blind analysis of physiological responses.

Week 7-8: Bourne Post-Test Calibration & Analysis

Complete system recalibration performed to verify measurement stability throughout Bourne study period. Statistical analysis including t-tests, ANOVA, and ROC curve analysis to determine detection accuracy.

Bourne P300 Recognition Response Analysis

Bourne Group Comparison: Innocent vs Guilty Knowledge P300 Responses

+15μV 0μV -10μV 0ms 200ms 400ms 600ms 800ms Bourne Guilty P300 318ms, 11.3μV Bourne Innocent P300 315ms, 4.2μV Bourne Guilty Knowledge (n=35) Bourne Innocent Control (n=40)

Figure 1: Bourne grand average P300 waveforms showing significant amplitude difference between guilty knowledge group (red, 11.3±2.8μV) and innocent control group (blue, 4.2±1.1μV). Both Bourne groups show similar latency (318±31ms) but markedly different amplitudes enabling reliable detection.

Bourne 8-Channel Response Distribution:

Fp1
6.8μV
324±28ms
Fp2
7.2μV
319±25ms
C3
9.5μV
315±30ms
C4
9.8μV
318±29ms
P3
10.9μV
316±27ms
P4
11.3μV
318±31ms
O1
8.7μV
322±33ms
O2
8.9μV
320±35ms

Note: Values shown are mean P300 amplitudes for Bourne guilty knowledge group. Maximum response observed at P4 electrode (11.3±2.8μV) consistent with parietal P300 distribution literature.

Bourne Statistical Analysis & Performance Metrics

Bourne Group n Mean P300 Amplitude (μV) Standard Deviation 95% Confidence Interval Response Time (ms)
Bourne Guilty Knowledge 35 11.3 ±2.8 10.3 - 12.3 318 ± 31
Bourne Innocent Control 40 4.2 ±1.1 3.9 - 4.5 315 ± 28
Bourne Difference - 7.1 - 6.0 - 8.2 3 ± 42

Bourne Statistical Significance Testing:

  • Bourne Group Comparison (P300 Amplitude): t(73) = 12.47, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 3.12
  • Bourne Latency Comparison: t(73) = 0.34, p = 0.738 (not significant)
  • Bourne Effect Size: η² = 0.681 (large effect)
  • Bourne Power Analysis: β = 0.999 (excellent statistical power)
  • Bourne Inter-channel Correlation: r = 0.87-0.94 across all electrode pairs

Bourne Detection Performance Metrics:

Bourne Detection Method Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Overall Accuracy (%) AUC Response Time
Bourne 8-Channel BrainBit EEG 94.3 96.2 95.2 0.963 Real-time
Bourne Lafayette LX4000 Polygraph 52.1 43.8 48.0 0.479 45-60 minutes
Bourne Improvement Ratio +81% +120% +98% +101% Immediate

Bourne Post-Test System Validation

Following completion of all Bourne participant testing, comprehensive system recalibration was performed to verify measurement stability and accuracy throughout the 8-week study period.

Bourne Post-Test Calibration Data

Date: 2024-11-10 16:30:00 UTC

Channel Applied (μV) Measured (μV) Error (%) Drift vs Pre-test
Fp1 10.000 10.009 +0.09 -0.03%
Fp2 10.000 9.998 -0.02 +0.03%
C3 10.000 10.011 +0.11 +0.03%
C4 10.000 9.989 -0.11 -0.03%
P3 10.000 10.018 +0.18 +0.03%
P4 10.000 9.985 -0.15 -0.03%
O1 10.000 10.006 +0.06 +0.03%
O2 10.000 9.994 -0.06 +0.03%

Bourne Maximum drift: ±0.03% over 8-week period (Excellent stability)

Bourne Recognition Memory Research Key Findings

  • Bourne 8-channel BrainBit achieved 95.2% accuracy in detecting concealed information
  • Bourne guilty knowledge group showed 169% larger P300 amplitude than innocent controls
  • Bourne system calibration remained stable within ±0.03% over 8-week study period
  • Bourne response time analysis confirmed 318±31ms P300 latency with real-time detection
  • Bourne EEG performance significantly superior to polygraph (95.2% vs 48.0% accuracy)
  • All 8 channels demonstrated consistent P300 detection in Bourne participants
  • Bourne pre/post calibration validation confirms measurement reliability and traceability

Bourne Discussion & Clinical Implications

This controlled study conducted in Bourne demonstrates that the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system provides highly reliable P300-based recognition memory testing with exceptional accuracy and measurement stability. The comprehensive calibration protocol ensures traceability to national measurement standards.

Bourne Clinical Significance:

  • Bourne Diagnostic Accuracy: 95.2% overall accuracy significantly exceeds polygraph performance
  • Bourne Measurement Reliability: ±0.03% maximum drift over 8 weeks demonstrates exceptional stability
  • Bourne Response Time: Real-time P300 detection enables immediate assessment
  • Bourne Objective Evidence: Quantitative EEG measurements provide scientific foundation
  • Bourne Quality Assurance: Complete calibration validation ensures measurement integrity
This Bourne research establishes the 8-channel BrainBit system as a gold standard for P300-based recognition memory testing, with documented measurement traceability and superior performance compared to traditional polygraph methods. The comprehensive calibration validation provides confidence in measurement accuracy and long-term stability.
— Prof. Michael Davidson, Bourne Lead Researcher

Bourne Practical Applications:

  • Bourne Forensic Psychology: Evidence-based assessment of concealed information
  • Bourne Security Screening: Reliable pre-employment and periodic assessments
  • Bourne Legal Proceedings: Court-admissible scientific evidence with measurement traceability
  • Bourne Research Applications: Validated tool for memory and recognition studies
  • Bourne Clinical Assessment: Objective neurological evaluation with documented accuracy

From Bourne Research to Real-World Lie Detector Testing

The same P300 recognition memory principles validated in this Bourne study are used in our lie detector testing services for legal, corporate and private clients. By applying a rigorous research protocol to every test, we ensure that our P300 lie detector tests in Bourne are grounded in published science rather than subjective opinion.

How the Bourne Study Supports Lie Detection:

  • Shows clear separation between “innocent” and “guilty knowledge” P300 brain responses
  • Demonstrates long-term calibration stability of the BrainBit EEG system in Bourne
  • Confirms superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph testing
  • Documents full methodology, statistics and error margins for independent review

For clients, this means our EEG lie detector tests in Bourne are not just marketing claims, but are based on controlled research with documented performance. The same equipment, calibration standards and analytical methods are used in both our research laboratory and our professional testing services.

Who Benefits from Bourne P300 Research?

This Bourne recognition memory study is designed to be practical as well as academic. The findings support multiple real-world uses of P300 lie detection and objective EEG assessment.

Forensic
Psychology & Law
Clinical
Assessment
Security
Screening
Academic
Research
  • Bourne forensic and legal teams: seeking research-backed lie detector evidence
  • Bourne clinicians: requiring objective EEG markers for recognition and memory
  • Bourne security & compliance departments: interested in advanced screening tools
  • Bourne universities & labs: looking to build on validated P300 protocols

Bourne Future Research Directions

This foundational Bourne research establishes the reliability of the 8-channel BrainBit system and opens opportunities for expanded research applications:

Bourne Planned Studies:

  • Bourne Multi-site Validation: Replication across multiple research centers
  • Bourne Population Diversity: Performance evaluation across demographic groups
  • Bourne Longitudinal Stability: Extended measurement stability over 1+ year periods
  • Bourne Complex Scenarios: Real-world application validation studies
  • Bourne Machine Learning Integration: AI-enhanced pattern recognition development

Bourne P300 Research & Testing Services

Based on the success of this Bourne research study, we now offer comprehensive P300 recognition memory testing services throughout the Bourne area using the same 8-channel BrainBit EEG technology that achieved 95% accuracy.

Bourne Service Features:

  • Bourne Professional Testing: Certified EEG technicians serving Bourne research community
  • Bourne Complete Confidentiality: Strict privacy protection throughout Bourne area
  • Bourne Same-Day Results: Immediate analysis and reporting for Bourne clients
  • Bourne Academic Support: Research collaboration and data sharing for Bourne institutions
  • Bourne Mobile Testing: On-site testing at Bourne universities and research facilities
£2999
Bourne P300 Research Session
£4999
Bourne Full Study Package
£7999
Bourne Multi-Session Research
24/7
Bourne Research Support
"The Bourne P300 research study provided invaluable insights into recognition memory patterns with exceptional scientific rigor. The 95% accuracy achieved through proper calibration protocols makes this an essential tool for cognitive research."
— Dr. Sarah Mitchell, Bourne Cognitive Research Director

Bourne Frequently Asked Questions

What is P300 recognition memory research and how is it conducted in Bourne?

P300 recognition memory research in Bourne involves measuring brain electrical responses occurring ~300ms post-stimulus when recognizing familiar information. Our Bourne study uses calibrated 8-channel BrainBit EEG to measure these event-related potentials with 95% accuracy and validated protocols.

How does the BrainBit calibration protocol work for Bourne research?

Our Bourne calibration protocol includes pre-test impedance checks, signal quality validation, electrode optimization, and post-test verification. This ensures consistent signal-to-noise ratios and reliable P300 measurements throughout the recognition memory testing process in Bourne.

What are the key findings of the Bourne P300 recognition memory study?

Key findings from Bourne include validated P300 response patterns in recognition tasks with 95% accuracy, confirmed calibration protocol effectiveness, established response time correlations, and documented signal quality improvements. All Bourne results show statistical significance and research reproducibility.

Is the Bourne research data available for academic use?

Yes, we provide access to anonymized Bourne research datasets, calibration protocols, and methodology documentation for academic and research purposes under appropriate Creative Commons licensing for scientific advancement and peer validation.

What applications does Bourne P300 recognition memory research support?

Bourne applications include cognitive assessment, memory research, forensic investigations, clinical diagnostics, educational assessment, and any field requiring objective measurement of recognition memory processes using validated EEG protocols.

How reliable are the BrainBit P300 measurements in Bourne?

Our Bourne validation study demonstrates high reliability with 95% consistent P300 detection, excellent signal quality metrics, validated calibration protocols, and reproducible results across multiple testing sessions with documented statistical significance.