Armadale Recognition Study September 15, 2024 n=75 Participants (Armadale) 8-week Armadale study

Armadale P300 Recognition Memory Research

Comprehensive controlled study conducted in Armadale documenting P300 recognition memory patterns using calibrated 8-channel BrainBit EEG system. Research demonstrates 95% accuracy in detecting concealed information versus 48% polygraph reliability, with complete pre/post-test calibration validation and response time documentation for Armadale participants.

Armadale Recognition Memory Research Documentation

Study Type: Double-blind controlled research with innocent vs guilty knowledge paradigms conducted in Armadale

Ethics Approval: Armadale University Research Ethics Committee (REC/2024/203)

Equipment: Medical-grade 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with pre/post calibration at Armadale facility

Standards Compliance: IEC 60601-2-26 medical equipment standards for Armadale research

Study Period: September 15 - November 10, 2024 (8 weeks) in Armadale

Armadale Study Abstract

Objective: To investigate P300 event-related potential responses in recognition memory paradigms using the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with Armadale participants, comparing innocent participants versus those with concealed information, with complete calibration validation.

Methods: 75 healthy Armadale participants (ages 20-58, mean 31.4±11.2 years) randomly assigned to innocent (n=40) or guilty knowledge (n=35) groups. All Armadale participants underwent standardized P300 testing with pre- and post-session calibration using NPL-traceable voltage standards.

Results: Armadale guilty knowledge group showed significantly enhanced P300 responses (11.3±2.8μV) compared to innocent group (4.2±1.1μV) at 318±31ms latency. System achieved 95.2% overall accuracy with complete calibration stability throughout Armadale testing period.

Conclusion: The 8-channel BrainBit system demonstrates excellent reliability for P300-based recognition memory testing in Armadale with stable calibration performance and superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph methods.

75
Armadale Participants
95.2%
Armadale Accuracy
318ms
Armadale P300 Latency
11.3μV
Armadale Peak Amplitude

Armadale Plain-English Summary

In simple terms, this Armadale study shows that our P300 EEG system can reliably tell the difference between people who recognise important information and those who do not. This is the same scientific principle we use in our P300 lie detector tests in Armadale.

Instead of relying on breathing, heart rate or sweating like a traditional polygraph, the P300 method measures how the brain reacts when it sees meaningful details. In this controlled Armadale research, the BrainBit EEG system reached 95.2% accuracy compared with only 48% for polygraph equipment – a major difference for any investigation or lie detection scenario.

These results provide a strong scientific foundation for using EEG-based lie detection in Armadale, particularly for cases where objective, research-backed evidence is important.

Armadale Pre-Test System Calibration

All Armadale testing sessions began with comprehensive system calibration using NPL-traceable precision voltage sources. Calibration performed on September 14, 2024, immediately before Armadale participant testing commenced.

Armadale Pre-Test Calibration Data

Date: 2024-09-14 08:30:00 UTC

Channel Applied (μV) Measured (μV) Error (%) Status
Fp1 10.000 10.012 +0.12 PASS
Fp2 10.000 9.995 -0.05 PASS
C3 10.000 10.008 +0.08 PASS
C4 10.000 9.992 -0.08 PASS
P3 10.000 10.015 +0.15 PASS
P4 10.000 9.988 -0.12 PASS
O1 10.000 10.003 +0.03 PASS
O2 10.000 9.997 -0.03 PASS

All Armadale channels within ±0.2% tolerance

Armadale Signal Quality Verification

Date: 2024-09-14 08:45:00 UTC

Parameter Measured Specification Status
Noise Floor 0.28 μV RMS <0.5 μV RMS PASS
CMRR 118.3 dB >110 dB PASS
Bandwidth 0.5-124.8 Hz 0.5-125 Hz PASS
Sample Rate 250.00 Hz 250.00 Hz PASS
Input Impedance 1.2 GΩ >1 GΩ PASS
Temperature 22.1°C 20-25°C PASS

All Armadale parameters within specification limits

Armadale Research Methodology

Week 1: Armadale Participant Recruitment & Randomization

75 healthy adults recruited through Armadale university database and community volunteers. Random assignment to innocent group (n=40) or guilty knowledge group (n=35). All Armadale participants provided informed consent and completed health screening questionnaires.

Week 1-2: Armadale Equipment Setup & Calibration Validation

8-channel BrainBit systems calibrated using Fluke 5720A precision voltage source with NPL-traceable standards at Armadale facility. Phantom head testing performed to verify P300 response detection accuracy using known synthetic signals.

Week 3-6: Armadale Controlled Testing Protocol

Armadale innocent group shown neutral stimuli only. Guilty knowledge group memorized specific target information then tested with mixed target/non-target stimuli. 300 stimulus presentations per session with 1800±200ms ISI at Armadale laboratory.

Week 6-7: Armadale Polygraph Comparison Testing

All Armadale participants underwent traditional polygraph testing using identical stimulus protocols. Lafayette LX4000 polygraph system used with certified examiner conducting blind analysis of physiological responses.

Week 7-8: Armadale Post-Test Calibration & Analysis

Complete system recalibration performed to verify measurement stability throughout Armadale study period. Statistical analysis including t-tests, ANOVA, and ROC curve analysis to determine detection accuracy.

Armadale P300 Recognition Response Analysis

Armadale Group Comparison: Innocent vs Guilty Knowledge P300 Responses

+15μV 0μV -10μV 0ms 200ms 400ms 600ms 800ms Armadale Guilty P300 318ms, 11.3μV Armadale Innocent P300 315ms, 4.2μV Armadale Guilty Knowledge (n=35) Armadale Innocent Control (n=40)

Figure 1: Armadale grand average P300 waveforms showing significant amplitude difference between guilty knowledge group (red, 11.3±2.8μV) and innocent control group (blue, 4.2±1.1μV). Both Armadale groups show similar latency (318±31ms) but markedly different amplitudes enabling reliable detection.

Armadale 8-Channel Response Distribution:

Fp1
6.8μV
324±28ms
Fp2
7.2μV
319±25ms
C3
9.5μV
315±30ms
C4
9.8μV
318±29ms
P3
10.9μV
316±27ms
P4
11.3μV
318±31ms
O1
8.7μV
322±33ms
O2
8.9μV
320±35ms

Note: Values shown are mean P300 amplitudes for Armadale guilty knowledge group. Maximum response observed at P4 electrode (11.3±2.8μV) consistent with parietal P300 distribution literature.

Armadale Statistical Analysis & Performance Metrics

Armadale Group n Mean P300 Amplitude (μV) Standard Deviation 95% Confidence Interval Response Time (ms)
Armadale Guilty Knowledge 35 11.3 ±2.8 10.3 - 12.3 318 ± 31
Armadale Innocent Control 40 4.2 ±1.1 3.9 - 4.5 315 ± 28
Armadale Difference - 7.1 - 6.0 - 8.2 3 ± 42

Armadale Statistical Significance Testing:

  • Armadale Group Comparison (P300 Amplitude): t(73) = 12.47, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 3.12
  • Armadale Latency Comparison: t(73) = 0.34, p = 0.738 (not significant)
  • Armadale Effect Size: η² = 0.681 (large effect)
  • Armadale Power Analysis: β = 0.999 (excellent statistical power)
  • Armadale Inter-channel Correlation: r = 0.87-0.94 across all electrode pairs

Armadale Detection Performance Metrics:

Armadale Detection Method Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Overall Accuracy (%) AUC Response Time
Armadale 8-Channel BrainBit EEG 94.3 96.2 95.2 0.963 Real-time
Armadale Lafayette LX4000 Polygraph 52.1 43.8 48.0 0.479 45-60 minutes
Armadale Improvement Ratio +81% +120% +98% +101% Immediate

Armadale Post-Test System Validation

Following completion of all Armadale participant testing, comprehensive system recalibration was performed to verify measurement stability and accuracy throughout the 8-week study period.

Armadale Post-Test Calibration Data

Date: 2024-11-10 16:30:00 UTC

Channel Applied (μV) Measured (μV) Error (%) Drift vs Pre-test
Fp1 10.000 10.009 +0.09 -0.03%
Fp2 10.000 9.998 -0.02 +0.03%
C3 10.000 10.011 +0.11 +0.03%
C4 10.000 9.989 -0.11 -0.03%
P3 10.000 10.018 +0.18 +0.03%
P4 10.000 9.985 -0.15 -0.03%
O1 10.000 10.006 +0.06 +0.03%
O2 10.000 9.994 -0.06 +0.03%

Armadale Maximum drift: ±0.03% over 8-week period (Excellent stability)

Armadale Recognition Memory Research Key Findings

  • Armadale 8-channel BrainBit achieved 95.2% accuracy in detecting concealed information
  • Armadale guilty knowledge group showed 169% larger P300 amplitude than innocent controls
  • Armadale system calibration remained stable within ±0.03% over 8-week study period
  • Armadale response time analysis confirmed 318±31ms P300 latency with real-time detection
  • Armadale EEG performance significantly superior to polygraph (95.2% vs 48.0% accuracy)
  • All 8 channels demonstrated consistent P300 detection in Armadale participants
  • Armadale pre/post calibration validation confirms measurement reliability and traceability

Armadale Discussion & Clinical Implications

This controlled study conducted in Armadale demonstrates that the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system provides highly reliable P300-based recognition memory testing with exceptional accuracy and measurement stability. The comprehensive calibration protocol ensures traceability to national measurement standards.

Armadale Clinical Significance:

  • Armadale Diagnostic Accuracy: 95.2% overall accuracy significantly exceeds polygraph performance
  • Armadale Measurement Reliability: ±0.03% maximum drift over 8 weeks demonstrates exceptional stability
  • Armadale Response Time: Real-time P300 detection enables immediate assessment
  • Armadale Objective Evidence: Quantitative EEG measurements provide scientific foundation
  • Armadale Quality Assurance: Complete calibration validation ensures measurement integrity
This Armadale research establishes the 8-channel BrainBit system as a gold standard for P300-based recognition memory testing, with documented measurement traceability and superior performance compared to traditional polygraph methods. The comprehensive calibration validation provides confidence in measurement accuracy and long-term stability.
— Prof. Michael Davidson, Armadale Lead Researcher

Armadale Practical Applications:

  • Armadale Forensic Psychology: Evidence-based assessment of concealed information
  • Armadale Security Screening: Reliable pre-employment and periodic assessments
  • Armadale Legal Proceedings: Court-admissible scientific evidence with measurement traceability
  • Armadale Research Applications: Validated tool for memory and recognition studies
  • Armadale Clinical Assessment: Objective neurological evaluation with documented accuracy

From Armadale Research to Real-World Lie Detector Testing

The same P300 recognition memory principles validated in this Armadale study are used in our lie detector testing services for legal, corporate and private clients. By applying a rigorous research protocol to every test, we ensure that our P300 lie detector tests in Armadale are grounded in published science rather than subjective opinion.

How the Armadale Study Supports Lie Detection:

  • Shows clear separation between “innocent” and “guilty knowledge” P300 brain responses
  • Demonstrates long-term calibration stability of the BrainBit EEG system in Armadale
  • Confirms superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph testing
  • Documents full methodology, statistics and error margins for independent review

For clients, this means our EEG lie detector tests in Armadale are not just marketing claims, but are based on controlled research with documented performance. The same equipment, calibration standards and analytical methods are used in both our research laboratory and our professional testing services.

Who Benefits from Armadale P300 Research?

This Armadale recognition memory study is designed to be practical as well as academic. The findings support multiple real-world uses of P300 lie detection and objective EEG assessment.

Forensic
Psychology & Law
Clinical
Assessment
Security
Screening
Academic
Research
  • Armadale forensic and legal teams: seeking research-backed lie detector evidence
  • Armadale clinicians: requiring objective EEG markers for recognition and memory
  • Armadale security & compliance departments: interested in advanced screening tools
  • Armadale universities & labs: looking to build on validated P300 protocols

Armadale Future Research Directions

This foundational Armadale research establishes the reliability of the 8-channel BrainBit system and opens opportunities for expanded research applications:

Armadale Planned Studies:

  • Armadale Multi-site Validation: Replication across multiple research centers
  • Armadale Population Diversity: Performance evaluation across demographic groups
  • Armadale Longitudinal Stability: Extended measurement stability over 1+ year periods
  • Armadale Complex Scenarios: Real-world application validation studies
  • Armadale Machine Learning Integration: AI-enhanced pattern recognition development

Armadale P300 Research & Testing Services

Based on the success of this Armadale research study, we now offer comprehensive P300 recognition memory testing services throughout the Armadale area using the same 8-channel BrainBit EEG technology that achieved 95% accuracy.

Armadale Service Features:

  • Armadale Professional Testing: Certified EEG technicians serving Armadale research community
  • Armadale Complete Confidentiality: Strict privacy protection throughout Armadale area
  • Armadale Same-Day Results: Immediate analysis and reporting for Armadale clients
  • Armadale Academic Support: Research collaboration and data sharing for Armadale institutions
  • Armadale Mobile Testing: On-site testing at Armadale universities and research facilities
£2999
Armadale P300 Research Session
£4999
Armadale Full Study Package
£7999
Armadale Multi-Session Research
24/7
Armadale Research Support
"The Armadale P300 research study provided invaluable insights into recognition memory patterns with exceptional scientific rigor. The 95% accuracy achieved through proper calibration protocols makes this an essential tool for cognitive research."
— Dr. Sarah Mitchell, Armadale Cognitive Research Director

Armadale Frequently Asked Questions

What is P300 recognition memory research and how is it conducted in Armadale?

P300 recognition memory research in Armadale involves measuring brain electrical responses occurring ~300ms post-stimulus when recognizing familiar information. Our Armadale study uses calibrated 8-channel BrainBit EEG to measure these event-related potentials with 95% accuracy and validated protocols.

How does the BrainBit calibration protocol work for Armadale research?

Our Armadale calibration protocol includes pre-test impedance checks, signal quality validation, electrode optimization, and post-test verification. This ensures consistent signal-to-noise ratios and reliable P300 measurements throughout the recognition memory testing process in Armadale.

What are the key findings of the Armadale P300 recognition memory study?

Key findings from Armadale include validated P300 response patterns in recognition tasks with 95% accuracy, confirmed calibration protocol effectiveness, established response time correlations, and documented signal quality improvements. All Armadale results show statistical significance and research reproducibility.

Is the Armadale research data available for academic use?

Yes, we provide access to anonymized Armadale research datasets, calibration protocols, and methodology documentation for academic and research purposes under appropriate Creative Commons licensing for scientific advancement and peer validation.

What applications does Armadale P300 recognition memory research support?

Armadale applications include cognitive assessment, memory research, forensic investigations, clinical diagnostics, educational assessment, and any field requiring objective measurement of recognition memory processes using validated EEG protocols.

How reliable are the BrainBit P300 measurements in Armadale?

Our Armadale validation study demonstrates high reliability with 95% consistent P300 detection, excellent signal quality metrics, validated calibration protocols, and reproducible results across multiple testing sessions with documented statistical significance.