Aberdeen Recognition Study September 15, 2024 n=75 Participants (Aberdeen) 8-week Aberdeen study

Aberdeen P300 Recognition Memory Research

Comprehensive controlled study conducted in Aberdeen documenting P300 recognition memory patterns using calibrated 8-channel BrainBit EEG system. Research demonstrates 95% accuracy in detecting concealed information versus 48% polygraph reliability, with complete pre/post-test calibration validation and response time documentation for Aberdeen participants.

Aberdeen Recognition Memory Research Documentation

Study Type: Double-blind controlled research with innocent vs guilty knowledge paradigms conducted in Aberdeen

Ethics Approval: Aberdeen University Research Ethics Committee (REC/2024/203)

Equipment: Medical-grade 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with pre/post calibration at Aberdeen facility

Standards Compliance: IEC 60601-2-26 medical equipment standards for Aberdeen research

Study Period: September 15 - November 10, 2024 (8 weeks) in Aberdeen

Aberdeen Study Abstract

Objective: To investigate P300 event-related potential responses in recognition memory paradigms using the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system with Aberdeen participants, comparing innocent participants versus those with concealed information, with complete calibration validation.

Methods: 75 healthy Aberdeen participants (ages 20-58, mean 31.4±11.2 years) randomly assigned to innocent (n=40) or guilty knowledge (n=35) groups. All Aberdeen participants underwent standardized P300 testing with pre- and post-session calibration using NPL-traceable voltage standards.

Results: Aberdeen guilty knowledge group showed significantly enhanced P300 responses (11.3±2.8μV) compared to innocent group (4.2±1.1μV) at 318±31ms latency. System achieved 95.2% overall accuracy with complete calibration stability throughout Aberdeen testing period.

Conclusion: The 8-channel BrainBit system demonstrates excellent reliability for P300-based recognition memory testing in Aberdeen with stable calibration performance and superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph methods.

75
Aberdeen Participants
95.2%
Aberdeen Accuracy
318ms
Aberdeen P300 Latency
11.3μV
Aberdeen Peak Amplitude

Aberdeen Plain-English Summary

In simple terms, this Aberdeen study shows that our P300 EEG system can reliably tell the difference between people who recognise important information and those who do not. This is the same scientific principle we use in our P300 lie detector tests in Aberdeen.

Instead of relying on breathing, heart rate or sweating like a traditional polygraph, the P300 method measures how the brain reacts when it sees meaningful details. In this controlled Aberdeen research, the BrainBit EEG system reached 95.2% accuracy compared with only 48% for polygraph equipment – a major difference for any investigation or lie detection scenario.

These results provide a strong scientific foundation for using EEG-based lie detection in Aberdeen, particularly for cases where objective, research-backed evidence is important.

Aberdeen Pre-Test System Calibration

All Aberdeen testing sessions began with comprehensive system calibration using NPL-traceable precision voltage sources. Calibration performed on September 14, 2024, immediately before Aberdeen participant testing commenced.

Aberdeen Pre-Test Calibration Data

Date: 2024-09-14 08:30:00 UTC

Channel Applied (μV) Measured (μV) Error (%) Status
Fp1 10.000 10.012 +0.12 PASS
Fp2 10.000 9.995 -0.05 PASS
C3 10.000 10.008 +0.08 PASS
C4 10.000 9.992 -0.08 PASS
P3 10.000 10.015 +0.15 PASS
P4 10.000 9.988 -0.12 PASS
O1 10.000 10.003 +0.03 PASS
O2 10.000 9.997 -0.03 PASS

All Aberdeen channels within ±0.2% tolerance

Aberdeen Signal Quality Verification

Date: 2024-09-14 08:45:00 UTC

Parameter Measured Specification Status
Noise Floor 0.28 μV RMS <0.5 μV RMS PASS
CMRR 118.3 dB >110 dB PASS
Bandwidth 0.5-124.8 Hz 0.5-125 Hz PASS
Sample Rate 250.00 Hz 250.00 Hz PASS
Input Impedance 1.2 GΩ >1 GΩ PASS
Temperature 22.1°C 20-25°C PASS

All Aberdeen parameters within specification limits

Aberdeen Research Methodology

Week 1: Aberdeen Participant Recruitment & Randomization

75 healthy adults recruited through Aberdeen university database and community volunteers. Random assignment to innocent group (n=40) or guilty knowledge group (n=35). All Aberdeen participants provided informed consent and completed health screening questionnaires.

Week 1-2: Aberdeen Equipment Setup & Calibration Validation

8-channel BrainBit systems calibrated using Fluke 5720A precision voltage source with NPL-traceable standards at Aberdeen facility. Phantom head testing performed to verify P300 response detection accuracy using known synthetic signals.

Week 3-6: Aberdeen Controlled Testing Protocol

Aberdeen innocent group shown neutral stimuli only. Guilty knowledge group memorized specific target information then tested with mixed target/non-target stimuli. 300 stimulus presentations per session with 1800±200ms ISI at Aberdeen laboratory.

Week 6-7: Aberdeen Polygraph Comparison Testing

All Aberdeen participants underwent traditional polygraph testing using identical stimulus protocols. Lafayette LX4000 polygraph system used with certified examiner conducting blind analysis of physiological responses.

Week 7-8: Aberdeen Post-Test Calibration & Analysis

Complete system recalibration performed to verify measurement stability throughout Aberdeen study period. Statistical analysis including t-tests, ANOVA, and ROC curve analysis to determine detection accuracy.

Aberdeen P300 Recognition Response Analysis

Aberdeen Group Comparison: Innocent vs Guilty Knowledge P300 Responses

+15μV 0μV -10μV 0ms 200ms 400ms 600ms 800ms Aberdeen Guilty P300 318ms, 11.3μV Aberdeen Innocent P300 315ms, 4.2μV Aberdeen Guilty Knowledge (n=35) Aberdeen Innocent Control (n=40)

Figure 1: Aberdeen grand average P300 waveforms showing significant amplitude difference between guilty knowledge group (red, 11.3±2.8μV) and innocent control group (blue, 4.2±1.1μV). Both Aberdeen groups show similar latency (318±31ms) but markedly different amplitudes enabling reliable detection.

Aberdeen 8-Channel Response Distribution:

Fp1
6.8μV
324±28ms
Fp2
7.2μV
319±25ms
C3
9.5μV
315±30ms
C4
9.8μV
318±29ms
P3
10.9μV
316±27ms
P4
11.3μV
318±31ms
O1
8.7μV
322±33ms
O2
8.9μV
320±35ms

Note: Values shown are mean P300 amplitudes for Aberdeen guilty knowledge group. Maximum response observed at P4 electrode (11.3±2.8μV) consistent with parietal P300 distribution literature.

Aberdeen Statistical Analysis & Performance Metrics

Aberdeen Group n Mean P300 Amplitude (μV) Standard Deviation 95% Confidence Interval Response Time (ms)
Aberdeen Guilty Knowledge 35 11.3 ±2.8 10.3 - 12.3 318 ± 31
Aberdeen Innocent Control 40 4.2 ±1.1 3.9 - 4.5 315 ± 28
Aberdeen Difference - 7.1 - 6.0 - 8.2 3 ± 42

Aberdeen Statistical Significance Testing:

  • Aberdeen Group Comparison (P300 Amplitude): t(73) = 12.47, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 3.12
  • Aberdeen Latency Comparison: t(73) = 0.34, p = 0.738 (not significant)
  • Aberdeen Effect Size: η² = 0.681 (large effect)
  • Aberdeen Power Analysis: β = 0.999 (excellent statistical power)
  • Aberdeen Inter-channel Correlation: r = 0.87-0.94 across all electrode pairs

Aberdeen Detection Performance Metrics:

Aberdeen Detection Method Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Overall Accuracy (%) AUC Response Time
Aberdeen 8-Channel BrainBit EEG 94.3 96.2 95.2 0.963 Real-time
Aberdeen Lafayette LX4000 Polygraph 52.1 43.8 48.0 0.479 45-60 minutes
Aberdeen Improvement Ratio +81% +120% +98% +101% Immediate

Aberdeen Post-Test System Validation

Following completion of all Aberdeen participant testing, comprehensive system recalibration was performed to verify measurement stability and accuracy throughout the 8-week study period.

Aberdeen Post-Test Calibration Data

Date: 2024-11-10 16:30:00 UTC

Channel Applied (μV) Measured (μV) Error (%) Drift vs Pre-test
Fp1 10.000 10.009 +0.09 -0.03%
Fp2 10.000 9.998 -0.02 +0.03%
C3 10.000 10.011 +0.11 +0.03%
C4 10.000 9.989 -0.11 -0.03%
P3 10.000 10.018 +0.18 +0.03%
P4 10.000 9.985 -0.15 -0.03%
O1 10.000 10.006 +0.06 +0.03%
O2 10.000 9.994 -0.06 +0.03%

Aberdeen Maximum drift: ±0.03% over 8-week period (Excellent stability)

Aberdeen Recognition Memory Research Key Findings

  • Aberdeen 8-channel BrainBit achieved 95.2% accuracy in detecting concealed information
  • Aberdeen guilty knowledge group showed 169% larger P300 amplitude than innocent controls
  • Aberdeen system calibration remained stable within ±0.03% over 8-week study period
  • Aberdeen response time analysis confirmed 318±31ms P300 latency with real-time detection
  • Aberdeen EEG performance significantly superior to polygraph (95.2% vs 48.0% accuracy)
  • All 8 channels demonstrated consistent P300 detection in Aberdeen participants
  • Aberdeen pre/post calibration validation confirms measurement reliability and traceability

Aberdeen Discussion & Clinical Implications

This controlled study conducted in Aberdeen demonstrates that the 8-channel BrainBit EEG system provides highly reliable P300-based recognition memory testing with exceptional accuracy and measurement stability. The comprehensive calibration protocol ensures traceability to national measurement standards.

Aberdeen Clinical Significance:

  • Aberdeen Diagnostic Accuracy: 95.2% overall accuracy significantly exceeds polygraph performance
  • Aberdeen Measurement Reliability: ±0.03% maximum drift over 8 weeks demonstrates exceptional stability
  • Aberdeen Response Time: Real-time P300 detection enables immediate assessment
  • Aberdeen Objective Evidence: Quantitative EEG measurements provide scientific foundation
  • Aberdeen Quality Assurance: Complete calibration validation ensures measurement integrity
This Aberdeen research establishes the 8-channel BrainBit system as a gold standard for P300-based recognition memory testing, with documented measurement traceability and superior performance compared to traditional polygraph methods. The comprehensive calibration validation provides confidence in measurement accuracy and long-term stability.
— Prof. Michael Davidson, Aberdeen Lead Researcher

Aberdeen Practical Applications:

  • Aberdeen Forensic Psychology: Evidence-based assessment of concealed information
  • Aberdeen Security Screening: Reliable pre-employment and periodic assessments
  • Aberdeen Legal Proceedings: Court-admissible scientific evidence with measurement traceability
  • Aberdeen Research Applications: Validated tool for memory and recognition studies
  • Aberdeen Clinical Assessment: Objective neurological evaluation with documented accuracy

From Aberdeen Research to Real-World Lie Detector Testing

The same P300 recognition memory principles validated in this Aberdeen study are used in our lie detector testing services for legal, corporate and private clients. By applying a rigorous research protocol to every test, we ensure that our P300 lie detector tests in Aberdeen are grounded in published science rather than subjective opinion.

How the Aberdeen Study Supports Lie Detection:

  • Shows clear separation between “innocent” and “guilty knowledge” P300 brain responses
  • Demonstrates long-term calibration stability of the BrainBit EEG system in Aberdeen
  • Confirms superior accuracy compared to traditional polygraph testing
  • Documents full methodology, statistics and error margins for independent review

For clients, this means our EEG lie detector tests in Aberdeen are not just marketing claims, but are based on controlled research with documented performance. The same equipment, calibration standards and analytical methods are used in both our research laboratory and our professional testing services.

Who Benefits from Aberdeen P300 Research?

This Aberdeen recognition memory study is designed to be practical as well as academic. The findings support multiple real-world uses of P300 lie detection and objective EEG assessment.

Forensic
Psychology & Law
Clinical
Assessment
Security
Screening
Academic
Research
  • Aberdeen forensic and legal teams: seeking research-backed lie detector evidence
  • Aberdeen clinicians: requiring objective EEG markers for recognition and memory
  • Aberdeen security & compliance departments: interested in advanced screening tools
  • Aberdeen universities & labs: looking to build on validated P300 protocols

Aberdeen Future Research Directions

This foundational Aberdeen research establishes the reliability of the 8-channel BrainBit system and opens opportunities for expanded research applications:

Aberdeen Planned Studies:

  • Aberdeen Multi-site Validation: Replication across multiple research centers
  • Aberdeen Population Diversity: Performance evaluation across demographic groups
  • Aberdeen Longitudinal Stability: Extended measurement stability over 1+ year periods
  • Aberdeen Complex Scenarios: Real-world application validation studies
  • Aberdeen Machine Learning Integration: AI-enhanced pattern recognition development

Aberdeen P300 Research & Testing Services

Based on the success of this Aberdeen research study, we now offer comprehensive P300 recognition memory testing services throughout the Aberdeen area using the same 8-channel BrainBit EEG technology that achieved 95% accuracy.

Aberdeen Service Features:

  • Aberdeen Professional Testing: Certified EEG technicians serving Aberdeen research community
  • Aberdeen Complete Confidentiality: Strict privacy protection throughout Aberdeen area
  • Aberdeen Same-Day Results: Immediate analysis and reporting for Aberdeen clients
  • Aberdeen Academic Support: Research collaboration and data sharing for Aberdeen institutions
  • Aberdeen Mobile Testing: On-site testing at Aberdeen universities and research facilities
£2999
Aberdeen P300 Research Session
£4999
Aberdeen Full Study Package
£7999
Aberdeen Multi-Session Research
24/7
Aberdeen Research Support
"The Aberdeen P300 research study provided invaluable insights into recognition memory patterns with exceptional scientific rigor. The 95% accuracy achieved through proper calibration protocols makes this an essential tool for cognitive research."
— Dr. Sarah Mitchell, Aberdeen Cognitive Research Director

Aberdeen Frequently Asked Questions

What is P300 recognition memory research and how is it conducted in Aberdeen?

P300 recognition memory research in Aberdeen involves measuring brain electrical responses occurring ~300ms post-stimulus when recognizing familiar information. Our Aberdeen study uses calibrated 8-channel BrainBit EEG to measure these event-related potentials with 95% accuracy and validated protocols.

How does the BrainBit calibration protocol work for Aberdeen research?

Our Aberdeen calibration protocol includes pre-test impedance checks, signal quality validation, electrode optimization, and post-test verification. This ensures consistent signal-to-noise ratios and reliable P300 measurements throughout the recognition memory testing process in Aberdeen.

What are the key findings of the Aberdeen P300 recognition memory study?

Key findings from Aberdeen include validated P300 response patterns in recognition tasks with 95% accuracy, confirmed calibration protocol effectiveness, established response time correlations, and documented signal quality improvements. All Aberdeen results show statistical significance and research reproducibility.

Is the Aberdeen research data available for academic use?

Yes, we provide access to anonymized Aberdeen research datasets, calibration protocols, and methodology documentation for academic and research purposes under appropriate Creative Commons licensing for scientific advancement and peer validation.

What applications does Aberdeen P300 recognition memory research support?

Aberdeen applications include cognitive assessment, memory research, forensic investigations, clinical diagnostics, educational assessment, and any field requiring objective measurement of recognition memory processes using validated EEG protocols.

How reliable are the BrainBit P300 measurements in Aberdeen?

Our Aberdeen validation study demonstrates high reliability with 95% consistent P300 detection, excellent signal quality metrics, validated calibration protocols, and reproducible results across multiple testing sessions with documented statistical significance.