Witness Statement Credibility Case Study 2 Hub

Explore how our Witness Statement Credibility Case Study 2 methodology has been adapted across UK locations to help legal teams compare EEG and polygraph performance when evaluating critical testimony.

Case Study 2 Locations

Select a location-specific example based on the Case Study 2 template. Each page describes how EEG P300 analysis and polygraph comparison were used to support witness statement review.

London Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Birmingham Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Manchester Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Leeds Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Sheffield Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Liverpool Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Bristol Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Newcastle upon Tyne Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Nottingham Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Leicester Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Coventry Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Bradford Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Hull Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Plymouth Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Wolverhampton Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Derby Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Southampton Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Portsmouth Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Stoke-on-Trent Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Sunderland Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Reading Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Luton Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Milton Keynes Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Northampton Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Norwich Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Bournemouth Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Swindon Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Oxford Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Cambridge Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Ipswich Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Peterborough Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example York Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Middlesbrough Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Blackpool Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Bolton Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Huddersfield Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Stockport Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Warrington Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Slough Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Exeter Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Cheltenham Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Gloucester Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Colchester Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Eastbourne Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Maidstone Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Basildon Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Southend-on-Sea Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Wakefield Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Doncaster Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Rotherham Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Wigan Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Oldham Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Rochdale Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Burnley Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Preston Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Blackburn Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Halifax Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Barnsley Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Chester Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Lancaster Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Bath Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Salisbury Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Winchester Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Canterbury Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Harrogate Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Scarborough Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Lincoln Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Grantham Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Crewe Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Macclesfield Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Stafford Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Tamworth Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Cannock Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Lichfield Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Burton upon Trent Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Nuneaton Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Rugby Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Leamington Spa Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Stratford-upon-Avon Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Worcester Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Kidderminster Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Redditch Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Hereford Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Shrewsbury Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Telford Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Walsall Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Solihull Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Sutton Coldfield Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example West Bromwich Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Dudley Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Loughborough Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Kettering Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Corby Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Wellingborough Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Bedford Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example St Albans Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Watford Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Hemel Hempstead Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Stevenage Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Harlow Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Chelmsford Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Brentwood Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Gravesend Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Tunbridge Wells Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Ashford Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Folkestone Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Dover Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Margate Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Hastings Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Crawley Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Worthing Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Brighton Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Chichester Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Horsham Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Guildford Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Woking Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Basingstoke Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Andover Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Fareham Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Gosport Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Poole Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Weymouth Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Taunton Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Yeovil Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Bridgwater Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Weston-super-Mare Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Torquay Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Barnstaple Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Truro Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Newquay Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Falmouth Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Carlisle Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Barrow-in-Furness Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Kendal Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Penrith Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Darlington Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Hartlepool Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Durham Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Bishop Auckland Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Whitby Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Bridlington Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Grimsby Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Scunthorpe Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Boston Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Spalding Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Skegness Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example King's Lynn Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Great Yarmouth Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Edinburgh Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Glasgow Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Aberdeen Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Dundee Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Inverness Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Stirling Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Perth Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Paisley Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example East Kilbride Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Livingston Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Hamilton Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Kilmarnock Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Ayr Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Dunfermline Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Kirkcaldy Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Falkirk Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Cumbernauld Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Motherwell Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Dumfries Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Greenock Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Airdrie Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Fort William Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Oban Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example St Andrews Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Cardiff Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Swansea Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Newport Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Wrexham Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Bangor Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Aberystwyth Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Carmarthen Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Llanelli Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Neath Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Port Talbot Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Bridgend Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Merthyr Tydfil Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Caerphilly Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Barry Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Colwyn Bay Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Rhyl Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Llandudno Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Haverfordwest Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example Pontypridd Witness Statement Credibility – Case Study 2EEG 93% vs Polygraph 48% · Legal support example

Case Study 2 – Frequently Asked Questions

Is this case study legal advice?

No. The material is illustrative and educational. It shows how EEG-based assessments can be used to support legal teams, but it does not constitute legal advice or guidance on admissibility.

Does EEG decide who is telling the truth?

EEG provides scientific insight into how the brain responds to particular details. It can highlight patterns consistent with remembered vs rehearsed information, but legal professionals remain responsible for interpreting all evidence in context.

Can these methods be used in my jurisdiction?

Suitability, admissibility and procedural use vary by jurisdiction and forum. We recommend that any potential use is discussed with qualified local legal advisers.

How do we start a Case Study 2 style assessment?

Use our booking page to outline your situation. We will review the facts, constraints and timelines, and advise whether a structured EEG-based assessment is appropriate.

Interested in Witness Credibility Support?

Whether you are dealing with a live dispute, internal investigation or pre‑action review, we can adapt the Case Study 2 methodology to your needs.

Request a Consultation via Booking Page